Commons:Lisanslama

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Licensing and the translation is 36% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Licensing and have to be approved by a translation administrator.
Outdated translations are marked like this.

Shortcuts: COM:L • COM:LICENSE

For Ülkelere göre lisans kuralları için, lütfen Commons:Topraklara göre telif hakkı kuralları bölümüne bakınız., see Commons:Copyright rules by territory.
Other languages:
Bu sayfa Wikimedia Commons'un resmî politikalarından birinin çevirisidir. Bu sayfadaki çeviri eksik, eskimiş veya yanıltıcı olabilir. Tek resmî metnin İngilizce sürümde olduğunu unutmayın.

Bu sayfa bir avukat niteliğinde olmayıp, yalnızca örnek tabanlı öğretici ile karmaşık telif hakkı yasalarına genel bir bakış sunmaktadır. Bir görüntü veya medya dosyasının Wikimedia Commons'ta kabul edilir olup, olmadığına karar verilmesine yardımcı olması amaçlanmıştır. Kendi çalışmaları için Commons içerik kullanımı hakkında bilgi arıyorsanız, Commons:Wikimedia dışındaki içeriğin yeniden kullanımı bölümüne bakabilirsiniz.

Wikimedia Commons yalnızca özgür içeriği kabul etmektedir, yani, herkes tarafından, her zaman, herhangi bir amaç için telif hakkı kısıtlamaları bulunmayan görüntü ve diğer medya dosyaları kabul edilmektedir. Bu görüntü ve medya dosyalarından bazılarının kullanımlarında kısıtlamalar veya bazı özel lisansların kullanılması talep ediliyor olabilir. Bunun için lütfen Commons:Adil kullanım kısıtlamaları bölömüne bakınız. Belirli materyaller bazı ülkelerde kısıtlı olmadan kullanılırken hala üretildiği ülkede kısıtlama uygulanıyor olabilir. Bununla ilgili bazı ayrıntılar aşağıda açıklanmıştır. Wikimedia Commons bu tür medya dosyalarının sayfalarında kullanımı için açıklamalar getirmeye çalışır. Ancak hukuki olarak bu tür medyaların herhangi bir yasayı ve lisansı ihlal etmediğine dair sorumluluk medyayı yeniden yükleyene yani buraya yükleyene aittir.

Wikimedia Commons yalnızca

Wikimedia Commons'ta asla adil kullanım medyaları kabul edilmez: daha fazla bilgi için Commons:adil kullanım bölümüne bakın. Ayrıca yalnızca ticari olmayan lisansı altındaki medyalar da kabul edilmez.

Kabul edilen resimlerin lisansları, resim tanımlama sayfasında telif etiketleri kullanılarak, açık bir şekilde belirtilmek zorundadır. Tanımlama sayfasındaki tüm bilgiler gerekli lisans şartlarını sağlamalıdır.

Eğer telif haklarına sahip kişiye izin teklifinde bulunacaksanız, lütfen email şablonlarını kullanarak yapın.

Hızlı ama tam olarak doğru olmayan giriş

Kabul edilebilir lisanslar

Telif hakkı lisansı, telif hakkıyla korunan bir çalışmayı kimin ve nasıl kullanacağını belirten resmi bir izin belgesidir. Bir lisans yalnızca telif hakkı sahibi tarafından verilebilir, genellikle yazar (fotoğrafçı, ressam veya benzeri).

This cartoon comics to explain why Commons does not accept "non-commercial" licences. Click to view the full-size image.

Commonsta bulunan bütün materyaller herhangi biri tarafından, herhangi bir amaçla kullanılabilen özgür lisans altında olmak zorundadırlar. Lisans aşağıdaki koşulları sağlamak zorundadır:

  • Yeniden yayınlamaya ve dağıtmaya izin verilmiş olması zorunludur.
  • İkincil çalışmaların yayınlanmasına izin verilmiş olması zorunludur.
  • Çalışmanın ticari kullanıma açık olması zorunludur.
  • The license must be perpetual (non-expiring) and non-revocable.
  • Çalışmaya katkıda bulunmuş tüm üreticilerin izninin gerektirmesi olabilir.
  • İkincil çalışmaların aynı lisans altında yayınlanması gereği olabilir.
  • For digital distribution, use of open file formats free of digital restrictions management (DRM) may be required.

Sometimes, authors wish to release a lower quality or lower resolution version of an image or video under a free license, while applying stricter terms to higher quality versions. It is unclear whether such a distinction is legally enforceable, but Commons's policy is to respect the copyright holder's intentions by hosting only the lower quality version.

Aşağıdaki koşullarda olan resim veya medya dosyaları kesinlikle kabul edilmez:

  • Sadece Wikimedia'd kullanılabilen çalışmalar (bunun tek istisnası telif hakları Wikimedia Vakfına ait olan Wikimedia logoları ve diğer dizaynlarıdır).
  • Sadece ticari olmayan/eğitim amaçlı kullanıma açık olanlar.
  • Sadece adil kullanım gerekçeleriyle kullanılabilenler.
  • Üretenin izninin duyurulmasına rağmen, gerçekte izin verilmemiş çalışmalar.

Aşağıdaki örnekler genellikle kabul edilmez:

  • Kendisi özgür lisans altında bulunmayan yazılımların ekran yakalama görüntüleri. GPL veya benzeri özgür yazılım lisansları altında bulunan yazılımların ekran yakalama görüntüleri kabul edilir. Bkz: Commons:Screenshots.
  • TV/DVD/Video oyunları ekran yakalama görüntüleri. Bkz: Commons:Screenshots.
  • Taranarak veya yeniden üretilerek elde edilmiş telif hakları saklı fotoğraflar, özellikle kitap kapakları albüm/CD kapakları v.b. Bkz: Commons:Derivative works.
  • Telif hakları saklı semboller, logolar v.b. (Copyrighted symbols, logos, etc. (karmaşık olmayan ticari markalar hariç.)
  • Telif hakları saklı maskeler, oyuncaklar ve çalışmayı temsil eden diğer nesnele, örneğin çizgi film karakterleri. Bkz: Commons:Derivative works.

Ayrıca Commons telif hakları koruması düşmüş çalışmaları da kabul eder (örneğin, kamu malı olan çalışmalar). Daha fazla bilgi için kamu malı bölümünü okuyunuz.

For an explanation of the justification for this licensing policy, see Commons:Licensing/Justifications.

Çoklu lisanslama

This cartoon demonstrates the utility of multi-licensing one's own work. Click to view the full-size image.

Eğer en az biri özgür lisans kriterleriyle uyuşuyorsa, birden fazla lisanslama yapabilirsiniz. Örneğin, "ticari kulanımı sınırlandırılmış" lisans kullanabilirsiniz ancak aynı zamanda ticari kullanımı serbest bırakan başka bir lisans ile birlikte kullanırsanız.

Multi-Licensing with restrictive licenses may be desirable for compatibility with the licensing scheme of other projects; also, multi-licensing allows people who create derivative work to release that work under a restrictive license only, if they wish—that is, it gives creators of derivative works more freedom with regards to which license they may use for their work. See Commons:Multi-licensing.

Çok bilinen lisanslar

The following well-known licenses are preferred for materials on Commons:

Wikimedia Commons'daki Creative Commons Lisanslarının Özeti
Creative Commons Lisans Simgeleri ve İsimler Kısaltmalar & versiyonlar Kabul edilebilir olanlar Notlar
Public Domain Mark
Kamu malı 		CC Public Domain Mark 1.0 Generally OK Genellikle kabul edilebilir Sık sık flickr görüntülerinde bulunur ve çoğu durumda serbest lisanslı olarak kabul edilir. - see Public Domain section below
CC0 Button
Sıfır kamu malı, "Hak yok" 		CC0 OK Tamam
CC BY Button
Atıf 		CC BY (1.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0)‎ OK Tamam
CC BY-SA Button
Attribution-ShareAlike 		CC BY-SA (1.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0)‎ OK Tamam
CC BY-NC Button
Attribution-NonCommercial 		CC BY-NC (1.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0)‎ Not OK Kabul edilemez
CC BY-NC-ND Button
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 		CC BY-NC-ND (1.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0)‎ Not OK Kabul edilemez
CC BY-NC-SA Button
Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 		CC BY-NC-SA (1.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0)‎ Not OK Kabul edilemez
CC BY-ND Button
Attribution-NoDerivs 		CC BY-ND (1.0 2.0 2.5 3.0 4.0)‎ Not OK Kabul edilemez
Sembollerle ilgili notlar
CC BY Icon "BY"
This icon means that the image license requires attribution, as such an image is created "BY" a certain person ("BY" is not an acronym in this case).
CC SA Icon SA
This icon is for "Share Alike". It means that others may create derivative works but should publish their contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
CC NC Icon NC
This icon refers to a "Non-Commercial" license (not allowed on Commons)
CC ND Icon ND
This icon refers to a "No-Derivatives" license (not allowed on Commons)

See Commons:Copyright tags for more licenses.

Yasak lisanslar

Works which are not available under a license which meets the Definition of Free Cultural Works are explicitly not allowed. See the Wikimedia Foundation board resolution on licensing for more information.

Some examples of licensing statuses commonly found on the Internet, but forbidden on Commons, include:

Non-permitted licenses may only be used on Commons if the work is multi-licensed under at least one permitted license.

If an image is not OK, consider asking the author to release their work under a free license such as CC BY (Creative Commons Attribution license), or CC BY-SA (Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike).

GNU Özgür Belgeleme Lisansı

The GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) is not practical for most content, especially for printed media, because it requires that they be published along with the full text of the license. Thus, it is preferable to publish the work with a dual license, adding to the GFDL a license that permits use of the photo or text easily; a Creative Commons license, for example. Also, do not use the GPL and LGPL licenses as the only license for your own works if it can be avoided, as they are not really suitable for anything but software.

GFDL is not permitted as the only acceptable license where all of the following are true:

  • The content was licensed on or after 15 October 2018. The licensing date is considered, not the creation or upload date.
  • The content is primarily a photograph, painting, drawing, audio or video.
  • The content is not a software logo, diagram or screenshot that is extracted from a GFDL software manual.

Lisans bilgileri

Shortcut
Example image with the recommended detailed image description (see image page)

All description pages on Commons must indicate clearly under which license the materials were published, and must contain the information required by the license (author, etc.) and should also contain information sufficient for others to verify the license status even when not required by the license itself or by copyright laws.

Specifically, the following information must be given on the description page, regardless if the license requires it or not:

  • The License that applies to the material. This must be done using a copyright tag.
  • The Source of the material. If the uploader is the author, this should be stated explicitly. (e.g. "Created by uploader", "Self-made", "Own work", etc.) Otherwise, please include a web link or a complete citation if possible. Note: Things like "Transferred from Wikipedia" are generally not considered a valid source unless that is where it was originally published. The primary source should be provided.
  • The Author/Creator of the image or media file. For media that are considered to be in the public domain because the copyright has expired, the date of death of the author may also be crucial (see the section about public domain material below). A generic license template which implies that the uploader is the copyright holder (e.g. {{PD-self}}) is no substitution for this requirement. The only exceptions to this is if the author wishes to remain anonymous or in certain cases where the author is unknown but enough information exists to show the work is truly in the public domain (such as the date of creation/publication).

Of less importance, but should always be provided if possible:

  • The Description of the image or media file. What is it of? How was it created?
  • The Date and place of creation. For media that are considered to be in the public domain because the copyright has expired, the date of creation may be crucial (see the section about public domain material below).

These points of the description can be done at best using the Information template. For usage of this template see Commons:First steps/Quality and description.

Lisanslama kapsamı

In some cases, a document (media file) may have multiple aspects that can and have to be licensed: Every person that contributed a critical part of the work has rights to the results, and all have to make their contribution available under a free license—see derivative work. However, the distinctions are unclear and may differ from country to country. Here are a few examples to clarify:

  • For a music recording, the following aspects must be taken into account, and each must be under a free license (or in the public domain):
    • The score of the music (rights by the composer)
    • The lyrics of the song (rights by the writer)
    • The performance (rights by the performers)
    • The recording (rights by the technical personnel / recording company)
  • For a picture of artwork (also book covers and the like), it is similar:
    • The creator of the original artwork has rights to any reproductions and derivative work.
    • The photographer has rights to the image, if it is not a plain reproduction of the original.
  • For a picture of a building, note that the architect may hold some rights if distinct architectural features are shown, but see also Commons:Freedom of panorama.

This is often problematic, if the artwork is not the primary content of the image or is not clearly recognizable: in that case, usually only the creator of the resulting picture (recording, etc.) holds a copyright. For instance, when taking a photograph of a group of people in a museum, the photo may also show some paintings on the walls. In that case the copyright of those paintings does not have to be taken into account. The distinction however is not very clear. The Commons:De minimis policy has more information about this concept.

Note that the license for all aspects has to be determined and mentioned explicitly. Also note that most reproductions do not allow the person doing the reproduction to claim a new copyright; the creator of a digital image / reproduction of a picture owns no new copyright to the resulting digital image. The only relevant copyright is that of the original picture. This also applies to Screenshots.

Kamu malı olan materyaller

Shortcut
Further information: Help:Public domain

Material released under a license like CC0 is considered the equivalent of public domain material; works that lack originality and edicts are in the public domain; a few governments around the world, including the US Federal, California, and Florida governments place most of their works, including most of their public records in the public domain; the English Wikipedia's guideline on public domain material more precisely defines these many exceptions.

Commons accepts material that is in the public domain, that is, documents allowed by the above exception, or that are not eligible to copyright, or for which the copyright has expired. But the "public domain" is complicated; copyright laws vary between countries, and thus a work may be in the public domain in one country, but still be copyrighted in another country. There are international treaties such as the Berne Convention that set some minimum standards, but individual countries are free to go beyond these minimums. A general rule of thumb is that if the creator of a work has been deceased for more than 70 years, their works are in the public domain in the country the creator was a citizen of and in the country where the work was first published. If the work is anonymous or a collaborative work (e.g. an encyclopedia), it is typically in the public domain 70 years after the date of the first publication. If the author is unknown after an extensive search, a work may be presumed to be in the public domain 120 years after creation (see {{PD-old-assumed}} for more details).

1 Ocak, 1923’ten önce yayınlanan her eser kamu malıdır. 1 Ocak, 1964'ten önce yayınlanan ve telifleri yenilenmeyen çalışmalar kamu malıdır ([http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~lesk/copyrenew.html yenilenmiş olan kitap ve hariatalar için arama). 1 Mart, 1989'dan önce yayınlanmış, telif hakları bildirisi olmayan ("©", "Copyright" veya "Copr.") artı yayınlanma tarihi (bazı durumlarda çıkarılmış olabilir) artı telif hakkı sahibi (veya takma adı) olan eserler kamu malıdır.

1 Ocak, 1978'den sonra yayınalmış fotoğraf çalışmaları üreten kişi öldükten sonraki 70 yıl boyunca koruma altındadır. Yapılmış ancak 1 Ocak, 1978'den önce yayınlanmamış eserler telif kaydı yapılmasından sonraki 95 yıl boyunca, veya üretilme tarihinden sonraki 95 (anonim çalışmalar için) veya 120 (kişisel çalışmalar için) yıl boyunca, hangisi önce bitiyorsa, koruma altındadır. (daha fazla bilgi için bkz: [1])

However, the year and location of publication is essential. In several countries, material published before a certain year is in the public domain. In the U.S. this date is January 1, 1928. In some countries, all government-published material is public domain, while in others governments claim some copyright (see Commons:Copyright rules by territory).

In the US, the copyright situation for sound recordings (including those published before 1928) is a special case. Under Title II of the Music Modernization Act, recordings that were first fixed prior to February 15, 1972 are copyrighted for a period of time under US federal copyright that depends on when the recording was first published. This federal copyright applies regardless of any formalities (copyright notice, registration, and/or renewal.) The specific copyright term lengths are as follows:

  • Recordings that were first published prior to 1923 entered the public domain on January 1, 2022.
  • Recordings that were first published between 1923 and 1946 are copyrighted for a period of 100 years after first publication.
  • Recordings that were first published between 1947 and 1956 are copyrighted for a period of 110 years after first publication.
  • Recordings that were published after 1956 and first fixed prior to February 15, 1972 will enter the public domain on February 15, 2067.

Sound recordings that were first fixed on or after February 15, 1972 are subject to the same US copyright law term lengths and provisions as other works.

In some jurisdictions (like the United States), one can also explicitly donate work one has created oneself to the public domain. In other places (like the European Union) this is technically not possible; instead, one can grant the right to use the picture freely with, for example, the Creative Commons Zero Waiver, which waives all rights granted by copyright, but the waiver might not be legally binding in the full extent of what is normally understood as “public domain” (e.g. regarding authors' moral rights).

The Hirtle chart is a tool for helping to determine if something is in the public domain in the United States. Commons:International copyright quick reference guide helps to determine if a work first published outside the United States can be uploaded.

ABD ve ABD dışındaki telif hakkı yasalarının etkileşimi

Every faithful reproduction of Mona Lisa is considered by Commons to be public domain. See "Exception" in text for details.

Commons is an international project, but its servers are located in the U.S., and its content should be maximally reusable. Uploads of non-U.S. works are normally allowed only if the work is either in the public domain or covered by a valid free license in both the U.S. and the country of origin of the work. The "country of origin" of a work is generally the country where the work was first published.

[1]

When uploading material from a country outside the U.S., the copyright laws of that country and the U.S. normally apply. If material that has been saved from a third-party website is uploaded to Commons, the copyright laws of the U.S., the country of residence of the uploader, and the country of location of the web servers of the website apply. Thus, any licence to use the material should apply in all relevant jurisdictions; if the material is in the public domain, it must normally be in the public domain in all these jurisdictions (plus in the country of origin of the work) for it to be allowable on Commons.

For example, if a person in the UK uploads a picture that has been saved off a French website to the Commons server, the uploader must be covered by UK, French and US copyright law. For that person to upload that photograph to Commons, the photograph must be public domain in France, the UK and the US, or there must be an acceptable copyright license for the photograph that covers the UK, US and France.

Exception: Faithful reproductions of two-dimensional works of art, such as paintings, which are in the public domain are an exception to this rule. In July 2008, following a statement clarifying WMF policy, Commons voted to the effect that all such photographs are accepted as public domain regardless of country of origin, and tagged with a warning. For details, see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag.

Uruguay Round Agreements Act

Main page: Commons:URAA-restored copyrights

The Uruguay Round Agreements Act or URAA is a US law that restored copyrights in the U.S. on foreign works if that work was still copyrighted in the foreign source country on the URAA date. This URAA date was January 1, 1996 for most countries. This means that foreign works became copyrighted in the U.S. even if they had been in the public domain in the U.S. before the URAA date. See also Wikipedia:Non-U.S. copyrights.

Because the constitutionality of this law was challenged in court, Commons initially permitted users to upload images that would have been public domain in the U.S. without the URAA. However, the constitutionality of the URAA was upheld by the U.S. Supreme Court in Golan v. Holder. After discussion, it was determined that the affected files would not be deleted en masse but reviewed individually. There was further discussion about the best method for review of affected files, resulting in the creation of Commons:WikiProject Public Domain.

Files affected by the URAA should be tagged with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}.

Files nominated for deletion due to the URAA should be evaluated carefully, as should be their copyright status under US and local laws. A mere allegation that the URAA applies to a file cannot be the sole reason for deletion. If the end result of copyright evaluation is that there is significant doubt about the freedom of a file under US or local law, the file must be deleted in line with the precautionary principle.

PD 1.0 and Flickr

System-search.svgSee also: Commons:Flickr files.

CC Public Domain Icon

The Creative Commons Public Domain 1.0 mark (PDM) is often applied to images on photography websites such as Flickr.com, and is not a license. Despite this, the community found that when a user applies PDM to their own work, they are releasing their work to be in the public domain, and these works are believed to be freely licensed. For further information, see Accept files published by the copyright holder with a Public Domain Mark.

Fair use is not allowed on Commons

Wikimedia Commons does not accept content under the condition of fair use. See Commons:Fair use.

Türev çalışmalar

This montage is an example of a derivative work. It combines various preexisting images that are in the public domain or available under the Creative Commons BY-SA 3.0 license.

You want a picture of Mickey Mouse, but of course you can't just scan it in. Why not take a picture of a little action figure and then upload it? Don't. The reason why you can't upload photographs of such figures is that they are considered as derivative works. Such works can't be published without permission of the original creator.

The US Copyright Act of 1976, Section 101, says: "A derivative work is a work based upon one or more preexisting works, such as a translation, musical arrangement, dramatization, fictionalization, motion picture version, sound recording, art reproduction, abridgment, condensation, or any other form in which a work may be recast, transformed, or adapted. A work consisting of editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications which, as a whole, represent an original work of authorship, is a “derivative work”." A photograph of a copyrighted item is considered a derivative work in US jurisdiction. US Copyright Act of 1976, Section 106: "(...) The owner of copyright under this title has the exclusive rights to do and to authorize any of the following: (...) (2) to prepare derivative works based upon the copyrighted work;"

Therefore, "unauthorized" derivative works, like photographs of copyrighted action figures, toys, etc., must be deleted. For more information, see Commons:Derivative works.

Exception: So-called useful articles - objects with an intrinsic utilitarian function, even if commercial designs, are not subject to copyright protection in the US. Consequently, images thereof are not derivative works under US law. For details and applicability of this exception, see the Supreme Court’s decision in Mazer v. Stein, and {{Useful-object-US}}.

Basit tasarım

Logo of Microsoft – {{PD-textlogo}}

Regarding trademarks (see also Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter: Trademarks): Most commercial items and products are protected by intellectual property laws in one way or another, but copyright is only one such protection. It is important to make the distinction between copyright, trademarks, and patents. Wikimedia Commons generally only enforces copyright restrictions, for these reasons:

  1. Almost anything can be trademarked, and it wouldn't make sense to forbid everything.
  2. Trademarks and industrial designs restrictions are pertinent to industrial reproduction, but photographs of such items can otherwise be freely reproduced.

→ For these reasons Commons accepts any trademark whose copyright has expired. Moreover, Commons accepts images of text in a general typeface and of simple geometric shapes, even if it happens to be a recent trademarked logo, on the grounds that such an image is not sufficiently creative to attract copyright protection.

[2]

Such images should be tagged with {{PD-ineligible}} or one of the list of more specific tags for this kind of works (e.g. {{PD-textlogo}} for simple logos).

Raster renderings (i.e. PNG images) of uncopyrighted simple designs can themselves be regarded as being uncopyrighted. For vector images (i.e. SVG files) of uncopyrighted simple designs, the question as to whether the vector representation has its own copyright is less clear; see the English Wikipedia copyright information about fonts and the {{PD-textlogo}} talk page for more information.

It is often very difficult to determine whether a design is protected by copyright or not, and images of these sorts are frequently nominated for deletion, with various results. See Commons:Threshold of originality and/or “Threshold of originality” (in Wikipedia) for some guidance.

Fonts

"COM:FONT" redirects here. For the fonts available for SVG rendering, see meta:SVG fonts.
Shortcut

The raster rendering of a font (or typeface) is not subject to copyright in the U.S., and therefore is in the public domain. It may be copyrighted in other countries (see intellectual property of typefaces on Wikipedia). You should use {{PD-font}} in this case.

Telif hakkı kuralları

Geçerli telif hakkı kurallarıyla ilgili yönergeler şurada bulunabilir:

Ayrıca bakınız

Ayrıca bakınız

Notlar

  1. ↑ In cases where a work is simultaneously published in multiple countries, the "country of origin" is the country which grants the shortest term of copyright protection, per the Berne Convention.
  2. ↑ See Ets-Hokin v. Skyy Spirits Inc where it was decided that the SKYY vodka bottle and logo were not copyrightable.

Dış bağlantılar

Collections of laws:

Copyright treaties:

Other:

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Licensing/tr&oldid=762919782"