User talk:Bastique
Please start a topic by posting "Add topic"
|
File:Israeli_soldier_at_Abraham_mosque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Chesdovi (talk) 17:04, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
|
|
File:Outside_the_Project_Scope.pdf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Senator2029║talk 04:41, 15 January 2012 (UTC)
De-adminship warning[edit]
Dear Bastique. I am writing to you to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you Trijnstel (talk) 21:42, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
- Oh, poo. Here I thought I was getting messages by email, and I wasn't. And this never came up as a notice when I logged into Commons. I'm sad about this, didn't really want it to happen. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 03:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)
Personality rights deletion[edit]
I'm with you when it comes to deleting on a goodwill base rather than playing "gotcha". You don't have be a lone wolf. The deletion discussion mentioned on the mailing list had me pretty horrified. Time to be more active on the DR page... --Dschwen (talk) 16:34, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, it's pretty a fairly daunting discussion. The trick, I think, for some, is to maintain composure and not insult the intelligence or question motive of those who have been involved in the discussions. I think the regrettable decisions have been combination of poorly worded requests + limited involvement in discussions + focus on licensing over courtesy. I believe it's only a matter of broadening our thought process. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 18:12, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
Double DR closure[edit]
Because of your double closure, overlooking the two preceeding DRs for the same file, and for overlooking the evidence made in the arguments in the DR, I am forced to take this matter to AN/U. If you would like to defend why you kept it, despite all the evidence, feel free to. This is not about on you or your adminship, this is simply a matter that must be dealt with, and IDK where else to take it. Fry1989 eh? 06:05, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Thank you Bastique for finally pretty this issue to rest. Jetijones (talk) 16:49, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- I don't think this means that the issue is at rest. Merely that your version of the image remains undeleted. Anyway. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 17:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Hey bastique, in relation to File:68735-Kholoud.jpg, I have reverted the OTRS permission, due to its appearance on other websites before the upload date, such as this from 7 February 2011. It is possible that Tarteeb is the copyright holder, and that they have uploaded, but there are obviously going to be some doubt (low res, etc), that only OTRS can fulfill. russavia (talk) 00:39, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Hey Russavia, Tarteeb has already contacted OTRS and fulfilled that matter... the OTRS agent instructed Tarteeb to upload it himself. The evidence is in the email. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 01:14, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
- Let me be clear, the uploader has identified himself as the copyright holder prior to uploading the image. The OTRS agent involved instructed the uploader how to upload and release the image. The fact that the image is low res and appears on the web as of a prior date does not negate the uploader's claim of ownership. The image would have been released to news agencies prior to their upload here to Commons. The uploader intentionally chose a release on Commons releasing the image which is good enough, isn't it? Copyright ownership + intent to release + the right steps? No problem. I don't see the reason to cause people to jump through bigger hoops. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 01:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Template:Wtf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
91.57.85.33 02:37, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
Calder Eagle[edit]
Do I understand that the outcome of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eagle by A.Calder.jpg means that my own photos of this same sculpture, which were deleted as copyvios, may now be restored? - Jmabel ! talk 15:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- I closed the discussion because it was a new discussion that had unwittingly reopened a settled discussion. If the underlying sculpture is in fact in the public domain because of lack of notice, then any photographs of the sculpture would be permitted as photographs of a public domain piece of artwork. I advise you to take this to COM:U and cite that precedent. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 15:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- I just saw that you said your files were deleted as "out of scope" rather than for copyright reasons. If they were deleted out of scope, then this discussion would not apply. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 15:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
- Never mind, your phrasing "out of scope for copyright reasons" confused me. If they were deleted on grounds of copyright, then if the underlying sculpture is public domain, they should, in fact, be restored. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 15:59, 2 July 2012 (UTC)
Location?[edit]
Hi Bastique - do you have a photo location for File:Colinus virginianus (m).jpg, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 14:38, 8 July 2012 (UTC)
- Central Florida (Venus, Highlands County). I just added a Geolocation to the picture :) --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 01:54, 9 July 2012 (UTC)
Admin Request[edit]
I want to be Administrator on Afan Oromo section. I think no one is acting on that section I think. Is that possible? Teferi Kebebew (talk) 07:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
- Ask this question at COM:VP. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 05:58, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
|
Category:Negative_images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
McZusatz (talk) 17:44, 26 July 2012 (UTC)
Edit request[edit]
At File:Wikimedia New York City logo.svg I would like to add "Logotipo de Wikimedia Ciudad de Nueva York (Inglés)" in Spanish, and tack "(English)" at the end, as I want to see if one could have a Spanish version of this logo made. Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 03:45, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- done Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 03:54, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you :) WhisperToMe (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
Hello!
When you edited this image 2 years ago, you added four fragments to it, but you did not specify their origin. IMHO it is unlikely that each of 4 pictures is either a public domain image or your own work. Including other images in your work without providing the attribution may violate licenses of those images. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:30, 8 November 2012 (UTC)
- Hello!
- It's unlikely I did anything to violate licenses. So no. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 04:55, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Je ne vous crois pas. Spécifiez l'attribution s.v.p. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:58, 9 November 2012 (UTC)
- Note, the above reads "I don't believe you. Please specify attributions." This user is accusing me--someone with an active history on Commons, as an administrator (still), bureaucrat, and checkuser; a former steward, as well as having been a longtime employee of the Wikimedia Foundation--of lying. In the first place, we don't accuse other users of lying without evidence, or past history of making things up. Since I'm not active lately, I don't know if this kind of uncivil behavior is becoming normal around here or not, but it's a regrettable trend. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 22:32, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- I don't care that you don't believe me. That is your problem, not mine. The attribution is already perfectly specified and clear. If there are portions of images there that you don't think I created myself, then I used public domain images that don't require attribution. So stop menacing me, s.v.p. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 22:15, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
Incnis, you have any reason to doubt Cary here? Any proof any of those images aren't PD as he says? Béria Lima msg 23:14, 18 November 2012 (UTC)
- Well, Incnis Mrsi was absolutely right in his suspicions, those images are not public domain. At the very least the guitar (File:Babicz Octane Blue Flame.jpg) used without any attribution was CC-BY-SA 3.0. I'm not even going to search origin of other added pictures, it's the burden of uploader, not mine. --Trycatch (talk) 14:29, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- You are making claims (the guitar used;) as well with no factual basis. You also find it easy to accuse people of things that are unprovable. Again, it doesn't matter that you think one image is derived from the other, it does not make it a fact. The included image is so entirely different from the earlier image that making any attribution or proof of derivation from one to the other is impossible. The included portions are so small that proof of derivation is impossible to make, and the de minimis nature of their use (they do not actually provide any creative value on their own originality to the underlying SVG). There is no copyright "violation" involved.
- I'm sure that both you and Incnis Mrsi can find better things to do with your time than nit-picking fights with Commons users who have been less active in recent years. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:24, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- Rather than get into a war of principals with people who would rather start fights with other users over picayune matters, I've replaced the tiny de minimis image thumbnails with other tiny de minimis images thumbnails. Maybe the users who spend time questing these can get a life now. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 19:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, it was not de minimis, not even close, and yeah, it was a blatant copyright violation. Btw, expected reaction was something like "thanks for pointing out of my mistake" and not that bunch of nonsense attacks, but thanks for cleaning up after yourself anyway -- I understand that for some people it's just hard to be polite. --Trycatch (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, it was not "blatant copyright violation", not even close, and yeah, it was de minimis. Btw, expected reaction is something like, "It looks like there might be a problem with this image" and not that bunch of nonsense attacks. I'm sure you work hard to see the project is spotless, but it probably blinds you to the way you deal with other people--your way of handling people leaves a lot to be desired. Frankly, you're the one with a hard time being polite, it would seem. -- Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Was File:Babicz_Octane_Blue_Flame.jpg (its JPEG data) included to your upload entirely? If not, then by which factor was it scaled down? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 18:05, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Also, there is no such thing as a "copyright violation." The matter involved licensing, not copyright. You should probably learn to figure out what it is you're talking about before you go to people's talk pages and berate them. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, it was not "blatant copyright violation", not even close, and yeah, it was de minimis. Btw, expected reaction is something like, "It looks like there might be a problem with this image" and not that bunch of nonsense attacks. I'm sure you work hard to see the project is spotless, but it probably blinds you to the way you deal with other people--your way of handling people leaves a lot to be desired. Frankly, you're the one with a hard time being polite, it would seem. -- Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:33, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- No, it was not de minimis, not even close, and yeah, it was a blatant copyright violation. Btw, expected reaction was something like "thanks for pointing out of my mistake" and not that bunch of nonsense attacks, but thanks for cleaning up after yourself anyway -- I understand that for some people it's just hard to be polite. --Trycatch (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
- Rather than get into a war of principals with people who would rather start fights with other users over picayune matters, I've replaced the tiny de minimis image thumbnails with other tiny de minimis images thumbnails. Maybe the users who spend time questing these can get a life now. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 19:40, 19 November 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto squirrel car 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
99of9 (talk) 13:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto squirrel car.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
99of9 (talk) 13:17, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:Maker faire 2009 squirrel car squirrel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
99of9 (talk) 13:22, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto hippy vehicle 092.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
99of9 (talk) 13:23, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
|
|
File:Maker faire 2009 palo alto hippy vehicle 094.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
99of9 (talk) 13:24, 20 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi, Cary Bass, as you rightly say, this image should be renamed. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 07:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- Please be clear. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:19, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- The image says: latest version (probably need to rename the image...so what :)). That is why, and it is also a totally different image, so I do not quite understand. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- I should delete this image anyway. It serves no useful purpose, and it is a personal image. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 16:38, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
- The image says: latest version (probably need to rename the image...so what :)). That is why, and it is also a totally different image, so I do not quite understand. Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 16:35, 28 November 2012 (UTC)
Help: no-FoP Italy[edit]
Hi. When you have a moment, could you do me a favor. I decided to occupy my time to list the no-FoP files in Italy. It has been a long and difficult work that needs to be reviewed by administrators. Please, could you check if everything is correct on User:Raoli/Deletion requests/FoP Italy? Thanks! Raoli ✉ (talk) 23:19, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
Chapter logo for Wikimedia Cascadia?[edit]
Hi there. I see you uploaded the chapter logos for WM NYC. If you have the ability and time, would it be possible to upload logos (or other images such as banners, barnstars, etc.) for Wikimedia Cascadia? I am not familiar with how to create similar logos, so I made an appeal for assistance here. If you are not able to help, no worries, just had to ask! (I will likely ask several contributors for assistance, so it might be worth checking to see if someone else has already offered to help or has uploaded images -- thanks!) --Another Believer (talk) 22:19, 7 December 2012 (UTC)
Flip image[edit]
Can you flip the image so that it more like the Symantec logo? http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Symantec_1.svg http://v12ntoday.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/symantec-logo.gif --2.216.55.12 20:40, 26 December 2012 (UTC)
De-adminship warning[edit]
Dear Bastique. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you Trijnsteltalk 23:30, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
|
|
Template:ConvertToSVG-MN has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Ricordisamoa 09:38, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
Здравствуйте. Сделал логотип для чеченской википедии но не как не могу выбрать шрифт пожалуйста сделайте шрифт как здесь. С/у -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 08:34, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
- I ask how to change the font on the Russian here. -- Дагиров Умар (talk) 08:59, 6 March 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rudolf-Hillebrecht-Platz Hannover Bauverwaltung Büste Stadtbaurat Rudolf Hillebrecht Bildhauer Siegfried Zimmermann.jpg[edit]
Hello!
Your closure of of this DR is wrong. The German FOP-regulations do differ between indoors and outdoors. This image must be deleted if this sculpture is located in a building. This must be found out in the DR. But a valid evidence has not been brought. Please act accordingly. --High Contrast (talk) 17:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- My reading of the English-language version of German regulations says nothing about "indoor" versus "outdoor" public place. But I don't speak German. By all means, if you're certain it needs to be deleted, then, please delete it! One does not need to "find out that it's in a building" on the DR. It's obviously in a building. Look at he picture. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 02:10, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, FOP in Germany does differ between an outdoor or indoor installation. And it is not so clear that this sculpture is inside a building - especially for someone who was never there. Please revert your decission and let me know if I should handle this. --High Contrast (talk) 17:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)
Done --High Contrast (talk) 15:13, 10 July 2013 (UTC)
De-adminship warning[edit]
Dear Bastique, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you, odder (talk) 20:38, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
|
|
Dolley Madison has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
2602:306:CD29:AC00:1133:4ED4:B728:26B4 01:06, 27 April 2014 (UTC)
Request for file creation[edit]
Hello Bastique, I noticed you are the creator of File:Wikimedia Belgium.svg or a version the logo is derived from. Is it possible for you to create another version of this logo with the same text, but now on the right side of the round logo? Similar to the ones in the section 11 on and according to the Visual identity guidelines. The Visual identity guidelines describe that the distance between the round shape and the text should have the size of the diameter of the red circle. Is it possible for you to create that file for me? Thanks! Romaine (talk) 13:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Romaine. Thanks. As I was an employee of the Wikimedia Foundation at the time, I had more resources at my disposal to create these. Unfortunately, I do not at this time. --Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 14:32, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
Template:Wtf (yet another deletion debate with no new arguments)[edit]
|
|
Template:Wtf has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
DLindsley (My talk page) 16:31, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Cotton boll nearly ready for harvest.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cotton boll nearly ready for harvest.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 14:02, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
|
|
File:Wm-il.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ldorfman (talk) 23:21, 5 March 2015 (UTC)
De-adminship warning[edit]
Dear Bastique, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2016 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you, odder (talk) 22:24, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hey Bastique, could you confirm if that was really you? odder (talk) 20:34, 14 February 2016 (UTC)
|
|
File:Berazorback.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Kelly (talk) 08:32, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:ShakataGaNai at SF Meetup 07.jpg[edit]
|
| This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:ShakataGaNai at SF Meetup 07.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yours sincerely, JuTa 22:16, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
De-adminship warning[edit]
Dear {{subst:PAGENAME}}. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you--B dash (talk) 08:05, 19 August 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Commons:Service d'aide has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Antoineets (talk) 09:50, 24 August 2017 (UTC)
Hello
I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.
Cheers,
--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:09, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Template:Useful has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
El Grafo (talk) 14:03, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
|
|
Þ has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:50, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Review image[edit]
Hello .. Please check this picture https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sulaf_Fwakhergy.jpg Tik Tik (talk) 15:07, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
A goat for you![edit]
.jpg)
Oh hi. Is Matei. Have goat plz.
Ambient.Impact (talk) 01:24, 8 November 2018 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Palestinian child with portrait.jpg[edit]
|
| This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Palestinian child with portrait.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
And also:
Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 15:50, 27 December 2018 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Iguana iguana, with blue and red coloration.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
|
|
Template:Pagemovevandal has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Эlcobbola talk 07:24, 25 May 2019 (UTC)
Your photo on Repubblica[edit]
Your photo File:Tattooing in progress.jpg was used on https://bari.repubblica.it/cronaca/2011/05/18/news/tatuaggio-16420354/ without attribution. This is one of the largest newspapers in Italy. Nemo 20:08, 31 July 2019 (UTC)
- Go after them! Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 00:36, 23 August 2019 (UTC)
File:Map of New York County Outlines.svg[edit]
Hi, thanks for the file!
Two questions:
- What projection was used for the map?
- What was the source file from the U.S. Census?
I'm trying to figure out how to map latitude and longitude.
Thanks again. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SeanDeNigris (talk • contribs) 03:19, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
Important message for file movers[edit]
A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.
Possible acceptable uses of this ability:
- To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
- To perform file name swaps.
- When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)
Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.
The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Selaginella canaliculata.jpeg[edit]
Dear Bastique,
we are currently working on a student textbook with the title “Biologie” scheduled to be published in 2020. In addition an electronic version of this book is planned which will be sold to scientific institutions and libraries. In this book we would like to use the following illustration
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Selaginella_canaliculata.jpeg
We want to kindly ask you for the nonexclusive permission to use this material in this and future editions of our book including the electronic version and for the German speaking countries (Germany/Austria/Switzerland). Thanks in advance for your assistance.
Kindest regards 132.252.96.152 10:56, 19 December 2019 (UTC)UniDuE Biodiversity
- Yes! I give my permission! How do I get in touch with you? I just now saw this. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 05:35, 1 July 2020 (UTC)
Request[edit]
Hello.
Can you add the border of South Sudan which became independent in 2011 in File:Wikimedia chapters.svg, File:Wikimedia chapters x.svg, File:Wikimedia chapters existing.svg and File:Wikimedia chapters existing and regional user groups.svg? (There is not a Wikipedia chapter in South Sudan.)
Yours sincerely, Maphobbyist (talk) 10:53, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Wikipedia v2 logo authorship[edit]
Hey Cary! Although File:Wikipedia-logo-v2-en.svg correctly lists the Wikimedia Foundation for attribution, it would be useful to also list who at the Wikimedia Foundation actually created it. Right now, that seems to be unknown, but you are the most likely candidate since you unloaded the file. Can you confirm whether or not you are the person who actually created v2 of the Wikipedia logo? i.e. designed and implemented it? (I know Nohat designed v1 of the logo.) Kaldari (talk) 02:12, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
- Believe it or not, I actually don't remember. I assume I did, but maybe someone else had begun the work that I completed. Bastique ☎ appelez-moi! 03:36, 16 August 2020 (UTC)
|
|
User:CommonsJoe has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
/Leonel Sohns 14:05, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
|
|
File:Amigurumi graduate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:00, 11 October 2020 (UTC)
Wikpedia logo for gungbe language Wikipedia on incubator.[edit]
Hi Bastique, Please can you assist in creating an svg and png Wikpedia logo for Wikipedia Gungbe on incubator. the details and gungbe translations are in the bracket: language code(guw), Wikipedia(Wikipedia), The Free Encyclopedia(Owe Oyọnẹn Vọn Tọn). Thanks.--Samatics (talk) 17:08, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
|
|
Commons:Service d'aide has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. |
Dominic Mayers (talk) 01:22, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
Why did you delete "Main Page/es" as "not necessary"? Trying to find the Spanish-language homepage ("Portada") within the multilingual Wikimedia Commons is not obvious. Even worse, "Portada" has the same meaning in Asturian, Catalan, Galician, Portuguese, and Spanish, so it is inappropriate to use the page title of "Portada" for the Spanish language, without specifying which specific language is being used, e.g. "Portada/es" or "Portada/pt". All MediaWiki installations (regardless of the language used) recognize the English-language page of "Main Page" as the default (since the MediaWiki software is written in English, and then translated into other languages). For a multilingual wiki though, there must be a way to distinguish between multiple-language uses for the same Main Page. The best way to do this is either with a subpage, i.e. "Main Page/es" or with a namespace, i.e. "es:Main Page" which can then redirect to "es:Portada." Language namespaces are not set up on Wikimedia Commons though, and "es:Main Page" redirects to the Spanish Wikipedia, instead of to the Spanish homepage for Wikimedia Commons. Nicole Sharp (talk) 02:15, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
I transwikied this discussion to the Wikimedia Commons Village Pump since many different pages are affected (not just the one you deleted): "Commons:Village pump/Proposals#multilingual Commons". Nicole Sharp (talk) 02:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)
Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open![edit]
.jpg){kind=link}
Read this message in your language
Dear Wikimedian,
Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.
Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.
For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.
Round 1 will end on 1 May 2023, 23:59:59 UTC.
Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)