User talk:Johann Jaritz

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


MfG, RZ

hallo johann!

nur ein kleiner hinweis zu deinem bild auf der krumpendorf-seite: die kirche, die du fotografiert hast, ist die katholische und nicht die protestantische (die befindet sich beim bahnhof) kirche in krumpendorf..

mfg

Hallo Johann
Ein großes Dankeschön für die vielen großartigen Fotobeiträge!!
Ist die mail-adresse auf Wiktionary noch aktuell?? beste Grüße


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Johann Jaritz!

Hey... ich habe jaritz in meinem stammbaum. Die familie väterlicher seits kommt aus kärnten... brodnig, klogger. Es würde mir sehr helfen wenn sie sich bei mir melden würden. Mfg bettina s supaschnell@yahoo.de

Hallo liber Johann! ich wurde gerne Ihr Bild 'Klagenfurt-Lendkanal - St. maartiner Brücke' als Hauptmotiv für meine neue Homepage nehmen - its es in Ornung für Sie? LG; Natalija


català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  Esperanto  français  galego  italiano  lietuvių  magyar  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  português  polski  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Ελληνικά  македонски  русский  українська  հայերեն  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  فارسی  +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand

Thank you![edit]

Hi Johann!

We are about to visit Klagenfurt, and were searching the Internet for some views of the city. I just wanted to say how much I appreciate your effort in uploading all those fine pictures of the Klagenfurt area (and, I imagine, other parts of Austria as well) to Wikipedia!

Catalin (Bucharest, Romania)

WLM Barnstar[edit]

WLM Barnstar finals 2012.svg

My image got nominated for the international finals of Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, the world's largest photo contest!



Permission to Reproduce your image[edit]

Dear Johann, I am writing regarding your image of Mahler's composing hut (Mahler_Komponierhaeuschen_01.jpg). We would like permission to print the image in a publication - please contact me for details: amystol@gmail.com.

Ich hab da was gefunden[edit]

und zwar eine schöne Übersicht über alle Kategorien in Kärnten. Falls du einmal eine Toolseite machst, dann kannst du diesen Code dafür verwenden. Kann man aufklappen.

Kategorie Carinthia[edit]

Foto Weissenstein / Gummern[edit]

Hallo Johann,

hab das super Foto des Steinbruches der Fa Omya im Netz entdeckt. Würde es sehr gerne für mein wissenschaftliches Buch über Marmor verwenden. Ist es möglich, das Foto dort unter Nennung Ihres Namens als Urheber des Fotos abzudrucken? Bitte um Rückantwort, Kontaktaufnahme bitte per Mail bergfexx38@yahoo.com

danke,

Michael

Dust spot[edit]

Thanks for warning ;-) the dust spot was removed. Doronenko

Dornhofen[edit]

Lieber Herr Jaritz! Ich habe im Internet Ihr Foto von Schloss Dornhofen gefunden, nachdem mit der Geschichte des Hauses auch jene der Gewerken Mägerl (Megerl) verbunden ist. Darf ich, unter gegebenenfalls welchen Umständen, dieses Foto für mein Geschichtsbuch über die Gewerken nutzen? Mit besten Grüßen! Rudolf Schratter (rudolf.schratter@gmx.at)

Bildrechte und Zitierweise für ALpenflüsse Buch[edit]

Sehr geehrter Herr Jaritz, Das Institut für Hydrobiologie, Gewässermanagement (IHG) an der Universität für Bodenkultur Wien (BOKU) arbeitet aktuell an dem Buch „Flüsse der Alpen“: https://www.haupt.ch/Verlag/Buecher/Natur/Erde-Klima-Wasser/Fluesse-der-Alpen.html

Ziel des Buchprojekts ist die anschauliche und umfassende Dokumentation der vielfältigen Bedeutung der Alpenflüsse aus natur-, kultur- und sozialwissenschaftlicher Perspektive. Das Buch wird in etwa 520 Seiten umfassen und in einer Auflage von 2000 Stück auf Deutsch und 800 Stück auf Englisch erscheinen.

Wir würden gerne ihr Bild für die Darstellung in unserem Buch (Kapitel „Gurk“) verwenden (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Albeck_Seebachern_Gurkoberlauf_01112013_438.jpg). Deswegen möchten wir um Ihre Genehmigung zur Verwendung des ausgewählten Bildes bitten. Könnten Sie uns mitteilen, ob wir dieses zur Verwendung unseres Buches verwenden können und Ihre bevorzugte Art zitiert zu werden?

MIt freundlichen Grüßen, Olivia Wilfling — Preceding unsigned comment added by Olivia Wilfling (talk • contribs) 19:40, 6 August 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Sehr verehrte Frau Wilfling,

selbstverständlich können Sie o.g. Bild für ihr Buch „Flüsse der Alpen“ verwenden. Ich freue mich, wenn Ihnen das Foto zur Veranschaulichung dienlich ist.

Alles Gute bei der Fertigstellung Ihres umfangreichen Werkes.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Johann Jaritz


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 2a SO-Ansicht 16032023 9783.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 2a SO-Ansicht 16032023 9783.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Tigringer Straße Tigring Ort SO-Ansicht 16032023 3642.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Tigringer Straße Tigring Ort SO-Ansicht 16032023 3642.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 5 6 8 SO-Ansicht 16032023 9784.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 5 6 8 SO-Ansicht 16032023 9784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 10 SO-Ansicht 16032023 9782.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 10 SO-Ansicht 16032023 9782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Malleberg Landschaft O-Ansicht 16032023 9785.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Malleberg Landschaft O-Ansicht 16032023 9785.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Wörther See Halbinsel und Dobratsch 15032023 9746.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Wörther See Halbinsel und Dobratsch 15032023 9746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maria Wörth Halbinsel und Pyramidenkogel 15032023 9744.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Wörth Halbinsel und Pyramidenkogel 15032023 9744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Maria Wörth Kapuzinerinsel Unterdellach Julische Alpen 15032023 9752.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Wörth Kapuzinerinsel Unterdellach Julische Alpen 15032023 9752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg 52 Wohnhaus 15032023 9763.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg 52 Wohnhaus 15032023 9763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg Ginster 15032023 9764.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg Ginster 15032023 9764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg Toyota Auris 15032023 9765.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg Toyota Auris 15032023 9765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg Forst 15032023 9768.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg Forst 15032023 9768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Maria Wörth Halbinsel mit Kirchen 15032023 9760.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Wörth Halbinsel mit Kirchen 15032023 9760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg Karawankenblick 15032023 9754.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krumpendorf Pritschitz Pirkhofweg Karawankenblick 15032023 9754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Wörther See Halbinsel und Dobratsch 15032023 9747.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Wörther See Halbinsel und Dobratsch 15032023 9747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:03, 2 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3686.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3681.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3681.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3688.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3692.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3692.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3690.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:44, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg Historie 29032023 3685.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg Historie 29032023 3685.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg Briefkasten 29032023 3684.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg Briefkasten 29032023 3684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg Museumsgebäude 3683.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg Museumsgebäude 3683.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3687.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3687.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3691.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 3691.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg 17-18-32 Wohnhäuser 29032023 9857.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg 17-18-32 Wohnhäuser 29032023 9857.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg 36 Bildstock 29032023 9861.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg 36 Bildstock 29032023 9861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Wolfgangkapelle N-Ansicht 29032023 3707.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Wolfgangkapelle N-Ansicht 29032023 3707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Gipfel Stierplastik 29032023 3695.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Gipfel Stierplastik 29032023 3695.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Gipfel Stierkopfplastik 29032023 3698.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Gipfel Stierkopfplastik 29032023 3698.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:38, 5 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Gipfel Stierplastik 29032023 3696.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Gipfel Stierplastik 29032023 3696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Wolfgangkapelle N-Ansicht 29032023 3708.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Wolfgangkapelle N-Ansicht 29032023 3708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena NW-Ansicht 29032023 3697.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena NW-Ansicht 29032023 3697.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Magdalensberg-Straße Pavillon Aussichtspunkt 29032023 3713.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Magdalensberg-Straße Pavillon Aussichtspunkt 29032023 3713.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 9865.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Stadt auf dem Magdalensberg 29032023 9865.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 6 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena NW-Ansicht 29032023 3694.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena NW-Ansicht 29032023 3694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena Portal 29032023 3703.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena Portal 29032023 3703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena W-Wand Gitterfenster 29032023 3704.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena W-Wand Gitterfenster 29032023 3704.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena Hauptschiff mit Hochaltar 29032023 3705.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena Hauptschiff mit Hochaltar 29032023 3705.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:22, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena N-Ansicht 29032023 3706.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena N-Ansicht 29032023 3706.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:54, 7 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg 8 und 19 Wohnhäuser 29032023 9858.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg 8 und 19 Wohnhäuser 29032023 9858.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg 36 Bildstock 29032023 9854.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg 36 Bildstock 29032023 9854.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Amtsgebäude des Statthalters 29032023 9863.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Amtsgebäude des Statthalters 29032023 9863.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Birke mit Misteln 29032023 9862.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Birke mit Misteln 29032023 9862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Taberna Celtica 29032023 9864.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Taberna Celtica 29032023 9864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:06, 8 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Landschaft und Julische Alpen 29032023 9859.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Landschaft und Julische Alpen 29032023 9859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Landschaft 29032023 9860.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Landschaft 29032023 9860.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Löwenzahnblüte 29032023 3689.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Löwenzahnblüte 29032023 3689.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Amtsgebäude des Statthalters 29032023 3682.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Archäologischer Park Amtsgebäude des Statthalters 29032023 3682.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:46, 9 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Blick gen Westen Zechnerkogel Ulrichsberg 29032023 3700.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Blick gen Westen Zechnerkogel Ulrichsberg 29032023 3700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:56, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Forsythie 05042023 9890.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Forsythie 05042023 9890.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße W-Ansicht 05042023 9894.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße W-Ansicht 05042023 9894.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Narzissen 05042023 9891.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Narzissen 05042023 9891.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:24, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Abstellplatz für Bootsanhänger Segelboot 05042023 9895.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Abstellplatz für Bootsanhänger Segelboot 05042023 9895.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:26, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 35 Appartementhaus SO-Ansicht 05042023 9897.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 35 Appartementhaus SO-Ansicht 05042023 9897.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:27, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 33 Wohnhaus SO-Ansicht 05042023 9898.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße 33 Wohnhaus SO-Ansicht 05042023 9898.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Abzweigung Winklerner Straße 05042023 9896.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Abzweigung Winklerner Straße 05042023 9896.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hauptstraße 153 Gemeindeamt N-Ansicht 05042023 9899.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hauptstraße 153 Gemeindeamt N-Ansicht 05042023 9899.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:36, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hauptstraße 158 Geschäftshaus Morokutti Fensterläden 05042023 9900.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hauptstraße 158 Geschäftshaus Morokutti Fensterläden 05042023 9900.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:53, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Elisabethstraße Pörtschacherhof Garten Forsythie 05042023 9901.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Elisabethstraße Pörtschacherhof Garten Forsythie 05042023 9901.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:05, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Annastraße 10 Appartement-Villa W-Ansicht 05042023 9902.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 10 Appartement-Villa W-Ansicht 05042023 9902.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Paulaweg Hotel Sonnengrund Schaukasten 05042023 9904.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Paulaweg Hotel Sonnengrund Schaukasten 05042023 9904.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Alfredweg Ost-Ansicht 05042023 9907.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Alfredweg Ost-Ansicht 05042023 9907.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Wahlißstraße 7 Ferienpension 05042023 9906.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Wahlißstraße 7 Ferienpension 05042023 9906.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Wahlißstraße 11 Villa Johanna WSW-Ansicht 05042023 9909.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Wahlißstraße 11 Villa Johanna WSW-Ansicht 05042023 9909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:14, 12 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Elisabethstraße Einfahrt zum Parkhotel Leuchtkasten 05042023 9908.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Elisabethstraße Einfahrt zum Parkhotel Leuchtkasten 05042023 9908.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel NO-Ansicht 05042023 9910.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel NO-Ansicht 05042023 9910.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:13, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Maria Wörth Halbinsel mit Kirchen 05042023 9911.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Wörth Halbinsel mit Kirchen 05042023 9911.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Promenade 05042023 9912.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Promenade 05042023 9912.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Promenade 05042023 9916.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Promenade 05042023 9916.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 13 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Maria Wörth Halbinsel mit Kirchen 05042023 9913.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Wörth Halbinsel mit Kirchen 05042023 9913.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 05042023 9919.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 05042023 9919.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Halbinselpromenade Park 05042023 9917.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Halbinselpromenade Park 05042023 9917.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinsel Landspitz Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 05042023 9914.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinsel Landspitz Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 05042023 9914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 05042023 9922.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 05042023 9922.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:22, 14 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Editorial war and insults[edit]

Hi. User:Orijentolog, At first, he edited a page of his own accord, and there was no evidence to change the name of that page. In the following, he has linked me to another user without any evidence and has started an editing war two hours ago. He far from complying with the law, he edits my page. I tell him to please stop his destructive activities, but he continues his behavior. Please stop the destructive activity of this user. Ngsharif (talk) 03:25, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User:Ngsharif is a sockpuppet of globally blocked user who is abusing Wiki projects for several years. Just for the notice. --Orijentolog (talk) 03:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Halbinsel Landspitz Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 05042023 9921.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinsel Landspitz Park im Landschaftsschutzgebiet 05042023 9921.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Halbinselpromenade Park 05042023 9918.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Halbinselpromenade Park 05042023 9918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Parklaterne 05042023 9924.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Parklaterne 05042023 9924.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Weide und Schilfrohr 05042023 9925.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Weide und Schilfrohr 05042023 9925.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:25, 15 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Parklaterne und Bank 05042023 9926.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Parklaterne und Bank 05042023 9926.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:16, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 05042023 9927.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Uferzone mit Schilfrohr 05042023 9927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Halbinselpromenade Park 05042023 9920.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg Halbinselpromenade Park 05042023 9920.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pictogram voting comment (orange).svg Comment Appears tilted CCW. Is this natural, or camera tilt? --Tagooty 02:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
No camera tilt, it is natural. -- Johann Jaritz 04:00, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Symbol support vote.svg Support Ok. Good quality --Tagooty 04:20, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Pritschitz Werftenstraße 101 Angerer-Schlössl NW-Ansicht 05042023 9929.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Pritschitz Werftenstraße 101 Angerer-Schlössl NW-Ansicht 05042023 9929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 03:17, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannaweg Villa Christina und Villa Wörth 05042023 9930.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannaweg Villa Christina und Villa Wörth 05042023 9930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality --Tagooty 02:47, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hauptstraße Villa Seehort und Villa Miralago 05042023 9931.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hauptstraße Villa Seehort und Villa Miralago 05042023 9931.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:50, 16 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Maria Wörth Kapuzinerinsel und Pyramidenkogel 05042023 9934.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Wörth Kapuzinerinsel und Pyramidenkogel 05042023 9934.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad und Pyramidenkogel 05042023 9943.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad und Pyramidenkogel 05042023 9943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 05042023 9938.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 05042023 9938.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:12, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 05042023 9939.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade 24 Promenadenbad 05042023 9939.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinsel Landspitz Schiffslandesteg 05042023 9941.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinsel Landspitz Schiffslandesteg 05042023 9941.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Promenadenbad Brücke zur Blumeninsel 05042023 9942.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Promenadenbad Brücke zur Blumeninsel 05042023 9942.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:53, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel SW-Ansicht 05042023 9940.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel SW-Ansicht 05042023 9940.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:19, 18 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Bank 05042023 9944.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Bank 05042023 9944.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:09, 18 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 05042023 9933.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Pavillon 05042023 9933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Picture is tilted.--Jacek Halicki 02:06, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done @Jacek Halicki: Thanks for your review. Picture was rectified. —- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 05042023 9935.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinselpromenade Landspitz Schiffsanlegestelle 05042023 9935.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Picture is tilted.--Jacek Halicki 02:09, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done @Jacek Halicki: Thanks for your review. Picture was rectified. —- Johann Jaritz 03:37, 17 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:41, 17 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand mit Laternen 05042023 9948.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand mit Laternen 05042023 9948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Wahliß-Denkmal 05042023 9947.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Wahliß-Denkmal 05042023 9947.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Wahliß-Denkmal 05042023 9951.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Wahliß-Denkmal 05042023 9951.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:08, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Parkbänke 05042023 9954.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Parkbänke 05042023 9954.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:13, 19 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Parkhotel Park-Bar 05042023 9957.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Parkhotel Park-Bar 05042023 9957.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:48, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Wahliß-Denkmal 05042023 9950.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand Wahliß-Denkmal 05042023 9950.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand mit Laternen 05042023 9958.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand mit Laternen 05042023 9958.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel NW-Ansicht 05042023 9964.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel NW-Ansicht 05042023 9964.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 03:41, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand mit Laternen 05042023 9953.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand mit Laternen 05042023 9953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:20, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Lake's Hotel 05042023 9960.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Lake's Hotel 05042023 9960.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade und Parkhotel 05042023 9959.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade und Parkhotel 05042023 9959.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Annastraße 43 Hotel Astoria SO-Ansicht 05042023 9961.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 43 Hotel Astoria SO-Ansicht 05042023 9961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:20, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Annastraße 25 Villa Sole SO-Ansicht 05042023 9962.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 25 Villa Sole SO-Ansicht 05042023 9962.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Annastraße 38 Villa Vullriede SW-Ansicht 05042023 9968.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 38 Villa Vullriede SW-Ansicht 05042023 9968.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:21, 21 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand mit Laternen 05042023 9955.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Blumenstrand mit Laternen 05042023 9955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 05:30, 20 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Magnolie 05042023 9967.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Johannes-Brahms-Promenade Magnolie 05042023 9967.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:01, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Halbinsel Westbucht Segelboot 05042023 9963.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Halbinsel Westbucht Segelboot 05042023 9963.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:07, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Drautalbahn II Oberleitung 05042023 9969.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach 10.-Oktober-Straße Drautalbahn II Oberleitung 05042023 9969.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:02, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Leonstein Sportplatzstraße an der Drautalbahn II 16042023 3742.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Sportplatzstraße an der Drautalbahn II 16042023 3742.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteinerstraße Bahnunterführung 16042023 3744.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteinerstraße Bahnunterführung 16042023 3744.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg 13 Wohnhaus 16042023 3745.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg 13 Wohnhaus 16042023 3745.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:57, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Ostteil 16042023 3746.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Ostteil 16042023 3746.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Waldwanderweg Treppe im Ostteil 16042023 3749.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Waldwanderweg Treppe im Ostteil 16042023 3749.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 02:59, 23 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel NW-Ansicht 05042023 9966.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Hans-Pruscha-Weg 5 Parkhotel NW-Ansicht 05042023 9966.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Need to improve the tilt/perspective. Jacek Halicki 02:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done @Jacek Halicki: Thanks for your review. Photo was rectified. —- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Annastraße 43 Hotel Astoria SO-Teilansicht 05042023 9965.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Annastraße 43 Hotel Astoria SO-Teilansicht 05042023 9965.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Need to improve the tilt/perspective. Jacek Halicki 02:11, 22 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done @Jacek Halicki: Thanks for your review. Photo was rectified. —- Johann Jaritz 04:25, 22 April 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 06:42, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteinerstraße Bahnunterführung 16042023 3743.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteinerstraße Bahnunterführung 16042023 3743.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Ostteil 16042023 3747.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Ostteil 16042023 3747.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Waldwanderweg Treppe im Ostteil 16042023 3748.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Waldwanderweg Treppe im Ostteil 16042023 3748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Waldwanderweg Treppe im Ostteil 16042023 3750.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Waldwanderweg Treppe im Ostteil 16042023 3750.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:00, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Baumeinritzungen 16042023 3751.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Baumeinritzungen 16042023 3751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:01, 24 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Buchenwald 16042023 3752.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Buchenwald 16042023 3752.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:26, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3753.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3754.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3754.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Treppe zur Hohen Gloriette 16042023 3759.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Treppe zur Hohen Gloriette 16042023 3759.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Mittelteil 16042023 3756.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Mittelteil 16042023 3756.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:25, 25 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Mittelteil Unterholz 16042023 3755.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Mittelteil Unterholz 16042023 3755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Treppe im Westteil 16042023 3757.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Treppe im Westteil 16042023 3757.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Waldbank im Westteil 1604202 3758.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Waldwanderweg Waldbank im Westteil 1604202 3758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 04:04, 26 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Treppe zur Hohen Gloriette 16042023 3760.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Glorietteweg Treppe zur Hohen Gloriette 16042023 3760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Blick von der Hohen Gloriette 16042023 3764.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Blick von der Hohen Gloriette 16042023 3764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:07, 26 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Ortskern mit Zugbahnhof Blick von der Hohen Gloriette 16042023 3765.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Ortskern mit Zugbahnhof Blick von der Hohen Gloriette 16042023 3765.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg Ecke 10.-Oktober-Straße Kriegerdenkmal 16042023 3739.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg Ecke 10.-Oktober-Straße Kriegerdenkmal 16042023 3739.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Kirchweg 9 Wohnhaus 16042023 3740.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Kirchweg 9 Wohnhaus 16042023 3740.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:37, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Kirchweg Pfarrhofgarten Tor 16042023 3741.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Kirchweg Pfarrhofgarten Tor 16042023 3741.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Moosburger Straße 22 ehem. Mesnerhaus SW-Ansicht 16042023 3783.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Moosburger Straße 22 ehem. Mesnerhaus SO-Ansicht 16042023 3783.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:45, 27 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Kirchplatz 6 Volksschule Musikschule NO-Ansicht 16042023 3784.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Kirchplatz 6 Volksschule Musikschule NO-Ansicht 16042023 3784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Moosburger Straße 25 Villa Gloriette N-Ansicht 16042023 3781.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Moosburger Straße 25 Villa Gloriette N-Ansicht 16042023 3781.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg 2-4-6 Appartementhäuser 16042023 3780.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Seeburger Weg 2-4-6 Appartementhäuser 16042023 3780.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:17, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteiner Weg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3767.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteiner Weg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:42, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Leonstein Burgruine NW-Tor zum Hof 16042023 3768.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Burgruine NW-Tor zum Hof 16042023 3768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:27, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg 16042023 3770.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg 16042023 3770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Vorwerk-Gebäude im äußeren Hof 16042023 3771.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Vorwerk-Gebäude im äußeren Hof 16042023 3771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:28, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteiner Weg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3772.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteiner Weg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:37, 29 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteiner Weg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3773.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteiner Weg Waldwanderweg 16042023 3773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:29, 29 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Mittelteil 16042023 3775.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Mittelteil 16042023 3775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Mittelteil 16042023 3774.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Mittelteil 16042023 3774.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Ostteil 16042023 3776.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Ostteil 16042023 3776.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:20, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Teich 16042023 3777.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Teich 16042023 3777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:15, 30 April 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Ostteil 16042023 3779.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Seeburger Weg Ostteil 16042023 3779.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 30 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Zu deinen Aktionen in der Kategorie Category:Pfarrhof mit Stadel, Feldkirchen[edit]

Hallo Johann Jaritz,

  • das lt. BDA geschützte Objekt ist Pfarrhof mit Stadel (Category:Pfarrhof mit Stadel, Feldkirchen). Also ein denkmalgeschütztes Objekt aus 2 Teilen. Eine Aufteilung in zwei getrennte denkmalgeschützte Objekte ist nicht problemadäquat. Man kann die beiden von dir angelegten Objekte als Unterobjekte von Pfarrhof mit Stadel auslagern, wenn man unbedingt will, das denkmalgeschützte Objekt bleibt der Pfarrhof mit Stadel. Hilfreich ist dieses ständige Kleinklein nicht, insbesondere wenn es schwierig wird, die beiden Objekte getrennt ins Bild zu setzen. Werden neue Objekte des Stadels über die Denkmalliste hochgeladen, landen sie im jetzigen Zustand in der falschen Kategorie (Pfarrhof) - bedeutet Nacharbeit. Die Aufteilung auf zwei Unterkategorien kann nicht sauber über die Denkmallisten abgebildet werden, es wird immer Nacharbeit notwendig (magst du dich dazu committen?). Auch weil das u.U. ein Nacharbeiten in den Denkmallisten und auf Wikidata zur Folge hat. Mir ist das aufgefallen, weil deine Änderung in de:Benutzer:Wurgl/Interwiki_Rotlinks aufgeschlagen ist.
  • so stimmt dann der Inhalt von Wikidata Pfarrhof mit Stadel, Feldkirchen (Q38173315) nicht mit der Kategorie Category:Ehem. Pfarrhof Klein St. Veit, Feldkirchen überein.
  • im Idealfall gibt es nur ein Objekt mit einer Denkmal-ID, nicht 2.
  • Category:Ehem. Pfarrstadel Klein St. Veit, Feldirchen hat mE folgende Probleme:
    • du reklamierst die Kategorie (!) als dein Werk, das ist so nicht üblich.
    • du verbittest dir Änderungen an der Kategorie (!) ohne Rücksprache: Bitte lade an dieser Stelle keine auch nur minimal veränderte Fassung ohne Rücksprache mit dem Urheber hoch. ... Kategorien haben keinen Urheber nach der üblichen Praxis.
      • du tust das noch dazu nicht mit Hilfe des dafür vorgesehenen Bausteins {{No-new-version}}, sondern mit expandiertem Text.
    • typo im Namen
    • Syntaxfehler in der Denkmalkategorie
    • Koordinaten in Kategorien sind veraltet, statt dessen bitte ein Wikidata-Objekt anlegen und per {{Wikidata Infobox}} einbinden.
ich gehe mal davon aus, dass das alles nicht absichtlich passiert ist und korrigiere das entsprechend. Eine kurze Kontrolle von dem was du getan hast, wäre immer wieder mal angebracht.
  • Bezeichnungen wie Ehem. Pfarrhof ... halte ich für ungünstig, weil das ein ständiges Nachhecheln hinter Zustandsänderungen von Objekten zur Folge haben kann.

Bitte sei etwas achtsamer in deinen Änderungen. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:10, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo Herzi Pinki,
ich habe Deine Einwände zur Kenntnis genommen. Habe nur versucht, geänderte Tatsachen korrekt darzustellen. Denkmalgeschützte Pfarrhof und Pfarrstadel sind ehemalig. Vielleicht kann des BDA dies auch von sich aus aktualisieren. LG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Danke lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 16:30, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha N-Ansicht 29032023 9867.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha N-Ansicht 29032023 9867.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Friedhofsportal 29032023 3720.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Friedhofsportal 29032023 3720.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:41, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Bildstock und Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha 29032023 3717.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Bildstock und Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha 29032023 3717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Vorlaube Grabstein 1500 Gröblacher 29032023 3722.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Vorlaube Grabstein 1500 Gröblacher 29032023 3722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Vorlaube gotisches Portal 29032023 3723.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Vorlaube gotisches Portal 29032023 3723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha mit Friedhof 29032023 3716.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha mit Friedhof 29032023 3716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha mit Friedhof 29032023 3737.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha mit Friedhof 29032023 3737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha N-Ansicht 29032023 9866.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha N-Ansicht 29032023 9866.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrstadel West-Ansicht 29032023 3725.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrstadel West-Ansicht 29032023 3725.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrstadel SO-Ansicht 29032023 3726.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrstadel SO-Ansicht 29032023 3726.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:13, 2 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Friedhof Pfarrstadel 29032023 3732.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Friedhof Pfarrstadel 29032023 3732.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Epitaph 1521 Benedictus Gröblcher 29032023 3736.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Epitaph 1521 Benedictus Gröblcher 29032023 3736.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha röm. Grabinschrift 29032023 3734.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha röm. Grabinschrift 29032023 3734.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:58, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Epitaph Peter Edler von Sternfeld 29032023 3735.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Epitaph Peter Edler von Sternfeld 29032023 3735.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrstadel Süd-Ansicht 29032023 3729.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrstadel Süd-Ansicht 29032023 3729.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:15, 3 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteiner Weg Burgruine Leonstein Burgtor 16042023 3769.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Leonstein Leonsteiner Weg Burgruine Leonstein Burgtor 16042023 3769.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hallo Johann Jaritz, deine Verschiebung hinterlässt wieder mal einen zerbrochenen Link in der Denkmalliste. Im Artikel [1] hat sich bereits eine hilfsbereite Seele gefunden, den zerbrochenen Link wieder zu kitten.

2 generelle Anmerkungen:

  • Bitte achte bei Kategorieumbenennungen auf Commons darauf, alle Verwendungen in allen Wikipedias mit zu verbiegen. {{Category redirect}} funktioniert nicht mit automatischer Weiterleitung auf die gewünschte Zielseite, sondern erfordert einen weiteren Klick des Benutzers.
  • du machst die Verschiebungen manuell, was aufwändig und fehleranfällig ist. Vielleicht kannst du in der Zukunft ja gemäß Umbenennen einer Kategorie verschieben, einschließlich vorhergehender Diskussion (Werkzeug: Kategorie diskutieren).

Zum konkreten Fall:

  • Für mich ist die Verschiebung nach Propstei ... nicht nachvollziehbar
    • der Dehio (Seite 905) weiß nix von einer Propstei
    • der Artikel de:Pfarrkirche Stein im Jauntal weiß nix von einer Propstei (@Raul de Chissota: als Erstautor)
    • Der Kärntner Kreuzweg in Stein im Jauntal, die Pfarrkirche St. Laurentius und die hl. Hildegard von Stein auf [2] weiß nur, dass die Pfarrkirche der Propstei inkorporiert wurde.
  • insoferne wäre ich für ein Rückgängigmachen deiner Verschiebung, die korrekte Commonscat wäre Category:Pfarrkirche Stein im Jauntal

Mag vorher deine Meinung nach AGF hören. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:59, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

bitte um Klärung. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:11, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Hallo Herzi Pinki, die Verschiebung kann ohne weiteres durchgeführt werden. Keine Einwände meinerseits!
LG. -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Friedhofsportal 29032023 3719.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Friedhofsportal 29032023 3719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Kirchplatz Smode-Kreuz 29032023 3718.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Kirchplatz Smode-Kreuz 29032023 3718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrstadel Portal 29032023 3728.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrstadel Portal 29032023 3728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:40, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha mit Friedhof 29032023 3733.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha mit Friedhof 29032023 3733.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:12, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Vorlaube Friedhof 29032023 3724.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Ottmanach Pfarrkirche hl. Margaretha Vorlaube Friedhof 29032023 3724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:40, 4 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Magdalensberg Blick nach Süden Richtung Klagenfurt und Karawanken 29032023 3701.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Blick nach Süden Richtung Klagenfurt und Karawanken 29032023 3701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena S-Ansicht 29032023 3709.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena S-Ansicht 29032023 3709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena Portalwand 29032023 3714.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Filialkirche hll. Helena und Maria Magdalena Portalwand 29032023 3714.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Mesnerhaus SW-Ansicht 29032023 3715.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Magdalensberg Straße Mesnerhaus SW-Ansicht 29032023 3715.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Magdalensberg Gipfel Aussichtspunkt Laterne 29032023 3702.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Magdalensberg Gipfel Aussichtspunkt Laterne 29032023 3702.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:50, 5 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 7 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Narzissen 2803202 3669.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Narzissen 2803202 3669.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Zierkirsche 28032023 3667.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Zierkirsche 28032023 3667.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 purpurrötliche Bergenie 28032023 3673.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 purpurrötliche Bergenie 28032023 3673.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Zierkirsche 28032023 3677.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Zierkirsche 28032023 3677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Garage 2803202 3676.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Garage 2803202 3676.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --XRay 03:53, 6 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Wohnhaus 2803202 3671.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Wohnhaus 2803202 3671.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg Ecke 10.-Oktober-Straße Kriegerdenkmal 16042023 3738.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg Ecke 10.-Oktober-Straße Kriegerdenkmal 16042023 3738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Garage 2803202 3675.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Garage 2803202 3675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Forsythie 2803202 3670.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Forsythie 2803202 3670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 71 Toranlage 2803202 3674.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 71 Toranlage 2803202 3674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Parkbänke 15032023 3627.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Parkbänke 15032023 3627.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 03:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald SW-Ansicht 15032023 3619.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald SW-Ansicht 15032023 3619.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Rjcastillo 03:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Vorhalle Gatterl 15032023 3626.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Vorhalle Gatterl 15032023 3626.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Rjcastillo 03:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Vorhalle 15032023 3625.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Vorhalle 15032023 3625.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Rjcastillo 03:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Opferstock 15032023 3623.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Opferstock 15032023 3623.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Rjcastillo 03:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Wohnhaus 2803202 3671.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Wohnhaus 2803202 3671.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg Ecke 10.-Oktober-Straße Kriegerdenkmal 16042023 3738.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Khevenhüllerweg Ecke 10.-Oktober-Straße Kriegerdenkmal 16042023 3738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Garage 2803202 3675.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 69 Garage 2803202 3675.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:03, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Forsythie 2803202 3670.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 67 Forsythie 2803202 3670.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 71 Toranlage 2803202 3674.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Winklern 10.-Oktober-Straße 71 Toranlage 2803202 3674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:05, 7 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald S-Ansicht 15032023 3615.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald S-Ansicht 15032023 3615.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Außenkanzel Portal 15032023 3621.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Außenkanzel Portal 15032023 3621.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald S-Seite Fenster 15032023 3628.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald S-Seite Fenster 15032023 3628.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:15, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Schwelle Jahreszahl 15032023 3624.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Schwelle Jahreszahl 15032023 3624.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Feldaltar 15032023 3622.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pörtschach Goritschach Filialkirche hl. Oswald Feldaltar 15032023 3622.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feldkirchen Briefelsdorf Hubertusweg 4 TrippelGUT S-Ansicht 05052023 9971.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Briefelsdorf Hubertusweg 4 TrippelGUT S-Ansicht 05052023 9971.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Klein St. Veit SW-Ansicht 05052023 9976.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Klein St. Veit SW-Ansicht 05052023 9976.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Ingelsdorf Baumreihe 05052023 9979.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Ingelsdorf Baumreihe 05052023 9979.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:06, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Briefelsdorf Heuernte 05052023 9973.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Briefelsdorf Heuernte 05052023 9973.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Ingelsdorf Landschaft Bäume 05052023 9972.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Ingelsdorf Landschaft Bäume 05052023 9972.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:17, 10 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feldkirchen Klein St. Veit SW-Ansicht 05052023 9975.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Klein St. Veit SW-Ansicht 05052023 9975.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Briefelsdorf Heuernte Heuballen 05052023 9978.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Briefelsdorf Heuernte Heuballen 05052023 9978.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Briefelsdorf Heuernte Heuballen 05052023 9977.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Briefelsdorf Heuernte Heuballen 05052023 9977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Ingelsdorf Baumreihe 05052023 9983.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Ingelsdorf Baumreihe 05052023 9983.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:49, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Nassweg Landschaft Weiler 05052023 9981.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Nassweg Landschaft Weiler 05052023 9981.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:11, 11 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feldkirchen Maltschach Maltschacher See Straße 24 Ferienhaus 05052023 3787.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Maltschach Maltschacher See Straße 24 Ferienhaus 05052023 3787.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:39, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Naßweg Landschaft und Petzen 05052023 9980.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Naßweg Landschaft und Petzen 05052023 9980.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:42, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Ingelsdorf Baumstamm 05052023 9982.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Ingelsdorf Baumstamm 05052023 9982.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:43, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Blochlager 05052023 3794.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Blochlager 05052023 3794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:40, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Unterholzlager 05052023 3792.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Unterholzlager 05052023 3792.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 03:45, 12 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Schleifholz und Unterholzlager 05052023 3788.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Schleifholz und Unterholzlager 05052023 3788.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Blochlager 05052023 3795.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Blochlager 05052023 3795.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:59, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Blochlager 05052023 3789.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Blochlager 05052023 3789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Brennesseln 0505202 3793.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Brennesseln 0505202 3793.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:00, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Straße im Wald 0505202 3796.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Straße im Wald 0505202 3796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:02, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Waldwiese Heuballen 05052023 3790.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Waldwiese Heuballen 05052023 3790.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Waldwiese 05052023 3791.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feldkirchen Mattersdorf Waldwiese 05052023 3791.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Friedhof Karner NW-Ansicht 05052023 3808.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Friedhof Karner NW-Ansicht 05052023 3808.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas 05052023 3797.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas 05052023 3797.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 1 ehem. Pfarrhof SW-Ansicht 05052023 3814.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 1 ehem. Pfarrhof SW-Ansicht 05052023 3814.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:07, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas W-Ansicht 05052023 3798.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas W-Ansicht 05052023 3798.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Türschwelle 05052023 3805.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Türschwelle 05052023 3805.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle Opfertisch 05052023 3801.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle Opfertisch 05052023 3801.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle Schreiberrelief 05052023 3802.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle Schreiberrelief 05052023 3802.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle Bauquader mit Rankenrelief 05052023 3803.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle Bauquader mit Rankenrelief 05052023 3803.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 02:25, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liebenfels Glantschach 1 ehem. Pfarrstadel SW-Ansicht 05052023 3807.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 1 ehem. Pfarrstadel SW-Ansicht 05052023 3807.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 1 ehem. Pfarrstadel SO-Ansicht 05052023 3815.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 1 ehem. Pfarrstadel SO-Ansicht 05052023 3815.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Chorschluss 05052023 3809.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Chorschluss 05052023 3809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Friedhof Karner O-Ansicht 05052023 3810.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Friedhof Karner O-Ansicht 05052023 3810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:11, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas got. Gitterfenster 05052023 3816.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas got. Gitterfenster 05052023 3816.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:10, 16 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle 05052023 3799.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle 05052023 3799.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle Portal 05052023 3804.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Vorhalle Portal 05052023 3804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Fresko Kreuzigung 05052023 3817.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Pfarrkirche hl. Andreas Fresko Kreuzigung 05052023 3817.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:28, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Friedhof Karner O-Ansicht 05052023 3811.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenfels Glantschach 2 Friedhof Karner O-Ansicht 05052023 3811.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Gabriel Gehöft Hafner 05052023 9985.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Gabriel Gehöft Hafner 05052023 9985.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:15, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 2a SO-Ansicht 20022015 7677.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 2a SO-Ansicht 20022015 7677.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 10 Schloss Tigring 20022015 7674.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Schlossstraße 10 Schloss Tigring 20022015 7674.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:10, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Friedhof Rundkarner Apsis SO-Ansicht 20022015 7688.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Friedhof Rundkarner Apsis SO-Ansicht 20022015 7688.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd mit Rundkarner 20022015 7711.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd mit Rundkarner 20022015 7711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Turmaufgang und Chorschluss 20022015 7717.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Turmaufgang und Chorschluss 20022015 7717.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 03:06, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 21 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd mit Friedhof und Rundkarner 20022015 7684.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd mit Friedhof und Rundkarner 20022015 7684.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Turmaufgang und Chorschluss 20022015 7716.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Turmaufgang und Chorschluss 20022015 7716.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Friedhof Rundkarner NO-Annsicht 20022015 7719.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Friedhof Rundkarner NO-Annsicht 20022015 7719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moosburg Faning Filialkirche hl. Agnes und hll. Simon und Judas Thaddäus 20022015 7730.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Faning Filialkirche hl. Agnes und hll. Simon und Judas Thaddäus 20022015 7730.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moosburg Faning Filialkirche hl. Agnes und hll. Simon und Judas Thaddäus Portal 20022015 7738.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Faning Filialkirche hl. Agnes und hll. Simon und Judas Thaddäus Portal 20022015 7738.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:57, 20 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Außenansicht 20022015 7700.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Außenansicht 20022015 7700.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:43, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Matthäus 20022015 7721.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Matthäus 20022015 7721.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:45, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Johannes 20022015 7722.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Johannes 20022015 7722.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:31, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Ansicht 20022015 7758.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Ansicht 20022015 7758.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg S-Ansicht Fassaden-Ausschnitt 20022015 7755.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg S-Ansicht Fassaden-Ausschnitt 20022015 7755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7760.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7760.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7768.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg Ost-Detailansicht 20022015 7771.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg Ost-Detailansicht 20022015 7771.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:21, 23 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Markus 20022015 7724.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Markus 20022015 7724.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is a dust spot just over the head. Otherwise ok --Jakubhal 03:32, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done @Jakubhal: Thanks for your review. The dust spot was removed. —- Johann Jaritz 04:27, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:22, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SW-Ansicht 20022015 7748.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SW-Ansicht 20022015 7748.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg S-Ansicht 20022015 7749.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg S-Ansicht 20022015 7749.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SW-Turm 20022015 7753.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SW-Turm 20022015 7753.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:03, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7757.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7757.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7763.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg SO-Turm 20022015 7763.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:06, 24 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg NO-Turm 20022015 7773.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg NO-Turm 20022015 7773.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg O-Ansicht Fassaden-Ausschnitt 20022015 7767.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg O-Ansicht Fassaden-Ausschnitt 20022015 7767.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg NO-Turm 20022015 7770.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg NO-Turm 20022015 7770.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg NW-Turm 20022015 7777.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg NW-Turm 20022015 7777.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:16, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg Villa 20022015 7778.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klagenfurt Annabichl Schloss Mageregg Villa 20022015 7778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:56, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Lukas 20022015 7723.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moosburg Tigring Pfarrkirche hl. Egyd Antoniuskapelle Evangelist Lukas 20022015 7723.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]