User talk:Kaethe17

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Kaethe17!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Copyright status: File:G-63-11105 Postkarte-Frauenportraet-ONLINE.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:G-63-11105 Postkarte-Frauenportraet-ONLINE.jpg

Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:G-63-11105 Postkarte-Frauenportraet-ONLINE.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:07, 13 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg

Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 27 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saeed-roustayi-filmfest-muenchen-2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:08, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hostessen-outfit-olympia-1972-mineralogia-2022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:04, 29 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 1 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Joana-aderi.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Better categorization would be nice. --MB-one 10:56, 30 July 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nevin-aladag-villa-stuck-tusch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality for QI. -- Ikan Kekek 05:55, 3 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 6 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Nevin-aladag-villa-stuck-tusch.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nevin-aladag-villa-stuck-tusch.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 9 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg

Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 10 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Ino-athens-snowblind-2022.jpg[edit]

File:Ino-athens-snowblind-2022.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:30, 27 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:List H Bachmann I FM 2000-710-P-AU-BAC-001A 2-ONLINE.jpg[edit]

Hallo Kaethe17, per G7 kann das Bild nicht gelöscht werden, da es in Nutzung ist. Was meinst du mit "copyright issues"? Laut der Quellsite ist es CC-BY-SA. --Túrelio (talk) 11:27, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Túrelio, das Stadtmuseum, aus deren Sammlung Online es stammt, hat gerade einen Bug der Sammlung Online gemeldet. Das Bild wird als CC BY SA 4.0 ausgespielt, ist aber nicht frei. Deswegen muss es leider aus Urheberrechtsgründen wieder gelöscht werden. Wie geht man da am besten vor? --Kaethe17 (talk) 11:31, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(Ich kopiere User:Münchner Stadtmuseum auch mal hier rein)

Ich habe es jetzt als "copyvio" gelöscht. Falls es doch frei sein sollte, kann es auf Antrag wiederhergestellt werden. --Túrelio (talk) 11:38, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Vielen Dank für die Info, Túrelio --Kaethe17 (talk) 11:40, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Ino-breaking-barriers-of-equality-psirri-2022.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 09:33, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Krokoit-Vauquelinit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Support Good quality. --Ra'ike 19:56, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tetraedrit-kupferkies.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:01, 17 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mimetesit-wulfenit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ra'ike 16:37, 20 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vanadinit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 03:25, 22 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolframit-beryll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ra'ike 18:33, 24 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amazonit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Atakamit-chile.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:46, 31 March 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--Pi bot (talk) 07:06, 3 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chalkopyrit-malachit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Descloizit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:29, 1 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Gabriele Münter[edit]

Hall Kaethe17, könntest Du bitte die Lizenz von File:FM-2012-249--Arnim-G-Muenter-Gabriele-1 2-ONLINE.jpg nochmal überprüfen, ich finden den Vermerk für die angegebene Lizenz[1] in der Quelle nicht. --Ailura (talk) 13:58, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Ailura, komisch, das stand da schon mal richtig, und ich hab auch noch die Mail vom Museum, dass sie es freigeben. Ich hab die Museumsleute mal angeschrieben und meld mich, sobald ich die Antwort habe. --Kaethe17 (talk) 14:53, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Ailura, das Museum kann die freie Lizenz doch nicht erteilen. Ich hab speedy deletion beantragt. Sorry. --Kaethe17 (talk) 19:07, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

User talk:Kaethe17

Contents

Copyright status: File:G-63-11105 Postkarte-Frauenportraet-ONLINE.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

Copyright status: File:David-bielander-by-helen-britton-09-2021.jpg[edit]

File:Ino-athens-snowblind-2022.jpg[edit]

File:List H Bachmann I FM 2000-710-P-AU-BAC-001A 2-ONLINE.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gabriele Münter[edit]

Navigation menu