User talk:Magnolia677

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Magnolia677!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 20:47, 17 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Flinn For Senate.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ytoyoda (talk) 03:29, 30 July 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Category:Files from Internet Archive Book Images Flickr stream[edit]

Hi dear Magnolia677! Thanks for your message. Sure, this account can be really a gold mine of useful images for Commons and Wikipedias! Have a nice day and a good wiki-commons-job! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:34, 26 August 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:Deletion Review[edit]

Am presently trying to find out if the photo was published in Life--going through Google Books. Life was very pro-active about renewing its back issue copyrights. Think I've only seen one issue that slipped through "the cracks" as far as renewal goes and the issue in question was June 19, 1944. A few days ago, I'd advised the person about Life issues being regularly renewed. Let me give finding the photo in Life a try and then I'll comment at the DR page. We hope (talk) 00:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mt. Holly Plantation house, built in 1840, still occupied. Near Foote, Mississippi.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

JuTa 19:21, 21 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pan Am Venues[edit]

Hi, is it possible for you to get photos of the Pan Am Aquatics Center (one from the other side) + the Markham Pan Am Center? Thanks! Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:42, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Not possible for me. Let me see what I can find on Flickr. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks!! Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 15:44, 31 January 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]


Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg
Hello, Magnolia677. You have new messages at Jmabel's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

Flickr/Adam Moss photos[edit]

Hey, I just want to let you know that Roadgeek Adam on Flickr and Mitchazenia on Wikipedia/Commons are one in the same. I also do have my own category at Category:Photographs by Adam Moss and I'd appreciate it if you could add that when you upload my photos. I like keeping tabs. Mitch32(Never support those who think in the box) 04:38, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I'll keep an eye out for it. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 12:00, 19 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re: Photo location[edit]

Hello. I didn't tag the location on File:Markham-suburbs aerial-edit2.jpg, user:Lycaon did it in this edit. I don't know from where he took the coordinates. Sorry for *not* (edit) being of better help. Sting (talk) 15:22, 28 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hello. As indicated in the "Source" section of the image, File:Markham-suburbs_aerial-edit2.jpg is an edited version (sharpness, contrast and saturation) of the original photograph File:Markham-suburbs_id.jpg taken by IDuke. He is the contributor you have to contact to get further information about the location. Unfortunately he seems to be inactive for a while... and user:Lycaon (the one who added the location) who is now User:Biopics has been permanently blocked one month ago!
It looks like you're on your own on this one to find the exact location because I only made the post-processing on the image and don't have more information that the one given by the original photograph (which btw has no location details). Good luck. Sting (talk) 14:21, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How did you enhance Charles Evers[edit]

I like how you enlarged and cleared the Charles Evers image. How did you do it? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 23:25, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Luminaries of Panthiesm Mural Picture[edit]

Hi there. I missed the deletion discussion regarding https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Luminaries_of_Pantheism_Venice_Mural.jpg. I hold the copyright for both the image and the mural. What should I do? Thanks. NaturaNaturans (talk)

To clarify, I hold the copyright/license to the artwork. Please advise on how we should proceed. NaturaNaturans (talk)

There is a way to send confirmation of the copyright. I'm not sure how to do it. Leave a message at the Village Pump. You should get an answer. Magnolia677 (talk) 23:52, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Re:Copyright[edit]

If you noticied, the file is licensed as {{PD-USGov}}, and as a arrest photograph, the primary source is very likely to be the US Federal Government, therefore, no copyvio. If the work is not from the US Federal Government (like a State entity), it may be discussed via a normal DR, but a copyvio tag is totally inapropiate. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:58, 20 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Howard Johnson's Motor Lodge - Penns Grove, New Jersey.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Ubcule (talk) 19:42, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Reason given: "Suspicion that this was a "Flickrwashed" professional/corporate photo and not work of specified Flickr user confirmed; higher-res version from scan of a different copy of this postcard can be found here. Thus user did not own it and did not have right to license it under those terms." Ubcule (talk) 19:44, 22 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Howard Johnson's Motor Lodge - Penns Grove, New Jersey.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Didym (talk) 12:50, 23 December 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Lloyd's map of the lower Mississippi River from St. Louis to the Gulf of Mexico (map no. 3).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Newspaper Logos[edit]

Hello Magnolia677, some hours ago you reported several of my files for copyright violation. I am not sure why they would violate copyright, since most of them consist only of letters (e.g. The Wall Street Journal, The Denver Post, The News Journal) or have been in use for a very long time (Tampa Bay Times, Newsday, The San Diego Union-Tribune, Honolulu Star Advertiser). Did I upload it in the wrong format? I hope you can explain it to me. Thanks. --Adrio (talk) 08:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Adrio (talk) 08:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Yes, but an administrator removed my speedy delete notice from your file, so in fact it may not violate copyright. I'll wait for a response at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Copyright violations, but my apologies in advance if I am incorrect. Magnolia677 (talk) 09:53, 16 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Goshen skyline photo[edit]

Sure; go ahead. It occurs to me that a) when looking at that photo now I probably included too much sky and b) at some point in the future I should go back to that spot and take a newer version now that I have a better camera. Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Great. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 02:09, 14 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Thank you, Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 02:11, 9 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Tagging copyvios[edit]

Hi, When tagging copyright violations, please inform the uploader. This is best done using the gagdet. See in your preferences to enable them, tab "Gadget", section "Maintenance tools" : "AjaxQuickDelete" and "Quick delete". These add links in the left column (or right column for Hebrew, Arabic, etc., language interface). Regards, Yann (talk) 10:24, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Will do. Thanks. Magnolia677 (talk) 13:27, 8 January 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Columbus and Greenville Railway bridge over Yazoo River.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Columbus and Greenville Railway bridge over Yazoo River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality high enough for Q1 --Michielverbeek 15:01, 8 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 11 February 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:St. Michael's Episcopal Church, Charleston, South Carolina (1919).jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Elisfkc (talk) 19:45, 18 March 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Kodak Black, arrest photo, May 2016.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 21:45, 20 June 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:CSA monument - Pontotoc, Mississippi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

It's Kong of Lazers 你好 15:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why are you requesting a deletion of picture of mural in public space?[edit]

What's the reason you are requesting to delete this picture? The picture is in a location called Wynwood Walls in Miami, and people are encouraged to visit and take pictures. Have you been there? Did you take a good look at the picture? There are trees and soil, the picture is placed side up so you can visualize it better without having to turn your head. File:Miami_-_Wynwood_Art_District_-_Wynwood_Walls_-_Mural_of_Woman_with_Grapes_and_Vine.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dpalma01 (talk • contribs) 21:06, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Dpalma01: Please see my comment at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Miami - Wynwood Art District - Wynwood Walls - Mural of Woman with Grapes and Vine.jpg. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:11, 21 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Huron County, Ontario.jpg Photo Challenge – Third Place
Camera2 mgx bronze.svg
Congratulations!

Your picture Huron County, Ontario.jpg won the 3rd place in the Photo Challenge Cables and Wires, in November 2017. You can find the results of the challenge here.

-- Jarekt (talk) 15:53, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Jarekt: Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 17:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Photo requests of schools in the Mississippi Delta[edit]

Hi! Do you go down to the Mississippi Delta sometimes? If so, I can give you a list of photo ideas. Some schools in the Delta are architecturally significant and/or were significant in the Civil Rights struggle.

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 04:11, 19 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@WhisperToMe: Thanks for writing. I wish I could help, but don't plan on driving the Delta for a while. I have pics of an abandoned school in w:Silver City, Mississippi (I think it was in Silver City, though I can't the school on Google satellite); also have pics of this school and this school. I've actually photographed a lot of lesser-known locations in the South with a connection to the Civil Rights Movement, see the Safe House (w:Greensboro, Alabama); I wrote and have photos of w:Holt Street Baptist Church; see Valley Queen Missionary Baptist Church at w:Marks, Mississippi; see photo of w:R. S. Lewis Funeral Home at w:Funeral of Martin Luther King Jr., and many more. Cheers. Magnolia677 (talk) 08:30, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thanks again for the explanation! If you have pictures of the schools that you have taken, please upload them :) WhisperToMe (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:DunkerChurchAntietam1862.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sammyday (talk) 14:33, 21 November 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Mortlach, Saskatchewan (2019).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 05:59, 26 February 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Saskatchewan Highway 4 in Val Marie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 10:14, 2 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Update: Thanks for commenting on the A. Levine account. The problem has now been resolved as you can see here now.

Admin Ron made a separate reply here. You can now upload images from this account and anyone can license review them/or the flickr bot will pass them. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 20:48, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Leoboudv: Thank you again for your help. Magnolia677 (talk) 20:52, 3 March 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Sarnia, Ontario satellite image.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:15, 25 June 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:African-American barbershop in Aberdeen, Mississippi (circa 1920).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

130.18.248.39 18:52, 29 July 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Why are you requesting a deletion of picture of Trethevy Mill Rocky Valley.jpg?[edit]

I was on holiday in Cornwall and we stayed in Port Isaac. We were visiting Tintagel and Boscastle and we stopped for a walk in Rocky Valley. I took the shot from the bridge where the footpath crosses the river after the mill. I have a dozen or so pictures to corrobrate this walk. The picture was taken with my Sony RX 100 Mark III on Friday Oct 5th 2018. The bridge is an obvious point for a good shot and just because we had the same motive does not mean it is fraus. I work in regulatory affairs and I am actually quite offended by this. Kmtextor (talk) 18:34, 15 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

How to change / make new image of OpenStreetMap (neighborhood boundary)?[edit]

Hello Magnolia,

Can you refer me to anything on how to change or make a new image for OpenStreetMap in order to adjust the neighborhood boundary shown? This is related to the Washington Heights image because the reason I did that is that I was trying to fix the OpenStreetMap image that is there (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Washington_Heights,_Manhattan). It does not reflect what is generally considered to be the neighborhood nor what is said in the article itself. So I am trying to figure out how to edit the OpenStreetMap boundary.

Thanks so much!

Entropicvoxels (talk) 19:07, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Entropicvoxels: I'm not sure how to do that. Try asking at the help desk. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:32, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Also, the map you uploaded was deleted because it was a copyright violation. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:33, 4 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Issues[edit]

With Majore gone and my block expired, thanks for the issue on copyrighted items. I may choose to continue but decided to pull the plug immediately at any time.

I will continue to upload non-copyrighted items in the future. Take care. —-FreshCorp619 (talk) 14:40, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Juan Pablo II Blvd Tegucigalpa.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

==

--181.209.233.188 02:24, 1 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Main Street, Skowhegan, Maine (2015).jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Main Street, Skowhegan, Maine (2015).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:Well-Informed Optimist. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:29, 15 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Paradox, Colorado.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Paradox, Colorado.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Paradox, Colorado.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Nominated for deletion by User:A1Cafel. I am a software, please do not ask me any questions but the user who nominated your file for deletion or at the help desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 02:11, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Old bicycleML.jpg Hi you idiot, that is photo taken by myself. Even images of myself on RGB stock and here on Commons are the same, as well as my username Macieklew. I am the author of this photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Macieklew (talk • contribs) 22:27, 11 July 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Loafers Glory, North Carolina.jpg

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Loafers Glory, North Carolina.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Edmund L Gettier III ca 1960s umass v2.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation[edit]

The website https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2014/04/10/the-gettier-problem/ is using the original Family picture I published on 14 April 2021 File:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edmund_L_Gettier_III_ca_1960s_umass.jpg. The updated picture https:File://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Edmund_L_Gettier_III_ca_1960s_umass_v2.jpg published 16 April 2021 is an improved version of the that family photo without the imperfection. Both copies are family photos and owned and published myself. It is not clear to me how to proceed. Can you advise? Please note, the family has been working with websites to correct an inaccuracy. The following website has a picture which scattered around the internet, that is inaccurate and not my father: https://thesymposiummagazinedotcom.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/26369_edmund_gettier.jpg. That 1000wordphilospophy just updated the picture to the one I posted on Wikipedia 14 April 2021. Using the waybackmachine.com and going to November 28,2020 on the https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2014/04/10/the-gettier-problem/ site (e.g. https://web.archive.org/web/20201128172141/https://1000wordphilosophy.com/2014/04/10/the-gettier-problem/), you can inspect the code (F12 on most browsers) and validate the actual picture they used on 11/28/2020 was https://1000wordphilosophy.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/edmund-gettier.jpg, which incorrect nor the one I published 14 April. They updated this picture with the one I posted on Wiki originally at my request. Again, it is not clear to me how to proceed. Can you advise? DaveGettier (talk) 14:30, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

You may want to ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Magnolia677 (talk) 14:35, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Thankyou I posted there. That picture has been in my family for over 50 years. I do hope we can rectify this issue. DaveGettier (talk) 18:44, 17 April 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]



Images You Flagged for Copyright Are Used by Permission from Copyright Holder[edit]

User:Johnson1964 (talk) 1:33, 19 May 2021 (UTC)

Hello Magnolia,

You flagged two photos for deletion because of copyright violation. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Johnson1964#File%3ASam-Richter-Hall-of-Fame-Sales-Keynote-Speaker.jpg

Both of these images have been provided by the copyright owner, Sam Richter, and he has provided permission for their use. If you have any questions, you can email him at sam@samrichter.com

Can you please edit the images so they are in compliance with Wikipedia?

Thanks so much!

Issues[edit]

Re:File:Jimmy Smith 1960.jpeg[edit]

The image you flagged for deletion is in the public domain. The newspaper was published by the United States Army and is therefore in the public domain. Furthermore, on page two it specifically notes that the Star Presidian uses non-copyright material and permits its reissue. —Halvorsen brian (talk) 10:47, 20 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

P 1 9 9   03:17, 8 March 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright with Carolina[edit]

The author has allowed his images to be used to anyone and only requests that his his site is quoted along with his name. https://www.carolana.com/about_this_site.html DiscoA340 (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

I also checked about this issue on Help desk and was said the images were fine to be used under Attribution 4.0. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Help_desk#Help_Identifying_Copyright DiscoA340 (talk) 20:40, 4 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

New section[edit]

STOP IT!!! THE MOVIES ARE NOT YOURS GET LOST FROM MY PAGE! PLEASE! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoeart23 (talk • contribs) 11:23, 28 June 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Barack Obama, Thomas Jefferson High School for Science and Technology, Alexandria, Virginia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DinoInNameOnly (talk) 04:53, 26 August 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Just an FYI on reverting my edit on File:Kansas Governor Sam Brownback (left) and U.S. Secretary of Education --Arne Duncan observe a mural at the Kansas State Capitol in 2012.jpg. I removed Category:Flags of the Confederate States in art from that image because I added a new category, Category:Tragic Prelude. That's the title of the mural that Brownback and Duncan are looking at. Flags of the Confederate States in Art is one of the mural's categories. — WFinch (talk) 21:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@WFinch: What a silly error. My apology! Magnolia677 (talk) 21:44, 13 September 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Map of Augusta County, Virginia, 1886.tif

Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Map of Augusta County, Virginia, 1886.tif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ron Vitiello (U.S. Border Patrol) with John Kelly (U.S. Homeland Security Secretary).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:35, 15 January 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Fire engine in Schenectady, New York.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yngvadottir (talk) 22:00, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]