User talk:MB-one

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Frankfurter Grüngürtel[edit]

Du hast den Frankfurter Grüngürtel aus dem Landschaftsschutzgebiet Grüngürtel und Grünzüge in der Stadt Frankfurt am Main herausgeschoben und einen Querverweis hinzugefügt. Dadurch sind jetzt sehr viele im LSG liegende Flächen nicht mehr entsprechend kategorisiert. Warum hast du das denn verschoben? Meines Wissens nach liegt der Frankfurter Grüngürtel vollständig im LSG. Oder habe ich da einen Park übersehen, der zwar zum Grüngürtel, aber nicht zum LSG gehört? GPSLeo (talk) 10:50, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@GPSLeo,
die öffentlich verfügbaren Angaben, ob das eine Gebiet vollständig innerhalb des anderen liegt, sind widersprüchlich. Einerseits steht auf der Webseite des LSG: "Das großflächige Landschaftsschutzgebiet 'GrünGürtel (sic!) und Grünzüge der Stadt Frankfurt am Main' umfasst den gesamten GrünGürtel und seine umgebenden Grünzüge".[1] Andererseits wird z. B. der Bereich um den "Deutsche Bank Park", sowie der Boehle-Park in der offiziellen Freizeitkarte als Teil des Grüngürtels ausgewiesen,[2] sind jedoch laut der Karte des BfN, nicht Teil des LSG.[3]
Ich tendiere dazu den Karten zu glauben, zumal auch andere Angaben der städtischen Webseite zum Schutzgebiet fehlerhaft sind. MB-one (talk) 14:18, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Wobei die Freizeitkarte nicht Teil des Landschaftsplans und kein offizielles Dokument im eigentlichen Sinne ist. Ich würde die beiden Flächen eher nicht dem Grüngürtel zuordnen. Unabhängig davon halte ich die jetzige Form nicht für optimal. Bei der jetzigen Form sollten die im LSG liegenden Flächen und zusätzlich in die LSG Kategorie kopiert werden. Ich würde sie aber eher komplett dahin verschieben und das LSG als Unterkategorie in die Frankfurter Grüngürtel Kategorie einordnen, da sowieso alle "Grünzüge" aktuell unter "Grüngürtel" einsortiert sind. GPSLeo (talk) 16:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Umgekehrt macht noch weniger Sinn, da große Gebiete, die definitiv nicht Teil des Grüngürtels sind (z. B. der Grüneburgpark, Niederräder Ufer, die landwirtschaftlich genutzten Flächen um Zeilsheim und Sindlingen sowie entlang der A5), zum LSG gehören. MB-one (talk) 21:08, 14 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
  1. https://frankfurt.de/themen/umwelt-und-gruen/orte/schutzgebiete/landschaftsschutzgebiet#:~:text=Das%20gro%C3%9Ffl%C3%A4chige%20Landschaftsschutzgebiet%20%22Gr%C3%BCnG%C3%BCrtel%20und%20Gr%C3%BCnz%C3%BCge%20der%20Stadt%20Frankfurt%20am%20Main%22%20umfasst%C2%A0den%20gesamten%20Gr%C3%BCnG%C3%BCrtel%20und%20seine%20umgebenden%20Gr%C3%BCnz%C3%BCge
  2. https://frankfurt.de/-/media/frankfurtde/frankfurt-themen/umwelt-und-gruen/umwelt-und-gruen-a-z/pdf/veroeffentlichungen/gg_freizeitkarte_ausschnitt5_suedost.ashx
  3. https://geodienste.bfn.de/schutzgebiete

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bunkier, Gdansk (LRM 20201004 110211 shot 2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bunkier, Gdansk (LRM 20201004 110211 shot 2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:58, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 16 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Arcteryx Aerios, OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A0377).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arcteryx Aerios, OutDoor 2018, Friedrichshafen (1X7A0377).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:19, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Ant highway, Shai Hills, Shai-Osudoku (P1100055).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ant highway, Shai Hills, Shai-Osudoku (P1100055).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:59, 14 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Categorization problem[edit]

Be careful you reclassify categories in paleontology when they are actual animals, can you correct? THANKS. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:32, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

@Archaeodontosaurus Can you give an example, so I can investigate? MB-one (talk) 14:12, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
@Archaeodontosaurus I believe, I found the problem. Skeleton specimens is currently a subcategory of Fossils. May I assume that this is incorrect then? Thanks for your help. MB-one (talk) 14:18, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

MSC Preziosa, WPAhoi, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Hafen, Hamburg (P1080381).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MSC Preziosa, WPAhoi, Kaiser-Wilhelm-Hafen, Hamburg (P1080381).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:47, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

North Ridge, Korle-Klottey (P1090865).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Ridge, Korle-Klottey (P1090865).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --PantheraLeo1359531 17:41, 15 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Nissan Champ Bakkie, Cape Town (P1050773).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nissan Champ Bakkie, Cape Town (P1050773).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Halavar 12:31, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

D-ELWK, Mainz (P1090651).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! D-ELWK, Mainz (P1090651).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Too dark. Can you brighten it, especially the plane? -- Spurzem 11:35, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the review. --MB-one 19:46, 7 May 2023 (UTC) Symbol support vote.svg Support OK for me. --Milseburg 13:15, 15 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

DB Premium Lounge, Berlin (LRM 20210709 164739).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DB Premium Lounge, Berlin (LRM 20210709 164739).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:22, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Let L-410, Red Clay, Jana (P1100313).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Let L-410, Red Clay, Jana (P1100313).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 12:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Held MAN Lion's Intercity LE (LRM 20230502 075042-SR).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Held MAN Lion's Intercity LE (LRM 20230502 075042-SR).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 12:41, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Church, Rendsburg (P1100584).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church, Rendsburg (P1100584).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Too much uninteresting road in the foreground, but ok, I guess --Poco a poco 17:24, 19 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

North Ridge, Korle-Klottey (P1090882).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! North Ridge, Korle-Klottey (P1090882).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 15:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

Nissan Patrol, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1070877).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nissan Patrol, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1070877).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support A bit too much of foreground and a little bit underexposed but still QI to me --Poco a poco 15:25, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 24 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Candela, Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen (IB200007).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Candela, Interboot 2020, Friedrichshafen (IB200007).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is an individual blocking the view of the boat, I wonder if this might affect the QI status? Would also be better if the TV screen was in focus. --多多123 15:35, 19 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
The people are part of the composition, because it's a presentation. The TV is intentionall out of focus to avoid copyright conflicts. --MB-one 09:30, 22 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --多多123 13:44, 22 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bernsteinfischer, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060974).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernsteinfischer, Ribnitz-Damgarten (P1060974).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Symbol support vote.svg Support Good quality. --Tagooty 02:00, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Reply[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]