User talk:OS2Warp

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, OS2Warp!

Thank you for uploading images on Commons.

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them.

EugeneZelenko 03:08, 28 May 2005 (UTC)Reply[reply]

OS2Warp, parabéns por esta foto!!! Há muito tempo queria tirar uma foto assim mas nunca deu tempo de ir lá perto do aeroporto. Parabéns!!! abraço, FML IconSP.jpg hi 15:06, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Mas mesmo assim está muito boa! Parabéns!! FML IconSP.jpg hi 21:50, 6 May 2006 (UTC)Reply[reply]

De ASEditor para OSWarp na página OS2Warp[edit]

Desculpa ter criado a página, tem vezes que eu não tenho o que fazer e saio criando coisa. Não sei de onde eu tiro essa idéias, também não sou um usuário conhecido como você, Nuno Tavares e Alexanderps, Tchau Tchau. (A WP não continua mais!) ASEditor Ah, e posso adicionar um índice na sua página de discussão? Responda na minha discussão.
.
. Oi cara, obrigado por ter virado meu "tutor" como dizo o Wikipédia, tchau! User:Aseditor

Imagem do dia - POTD[edit]

OS2, desculpe a demora! Bom, eu sinceramente nunca mexi com as imagens do dia, portanto tenho pouco a te aconselhar. Sinceramente: o Lugusto é muito mais indicado pra responder a pergunta, pois manja muito mais do que eu destas questões técnicas. Eu mesmo demorei um bocado pra entender qual era o problema e confesso que ainda não entendi ainda inteiramente. Dantadd 01:10, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Estou impressionado—excelente trabalho de fotojornalismo :) Fvasconcellos 17:50, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

your photos[edit]

We have a category, here on commons for the crash photos - Category:Vôo TAM 3054, please put any future photos in it. --Orlovic (talk) 18:28, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Repórter fotográfico[edit]

Carlos, vulgo OS2Warp, o rrrrrepórter-ter-ter..... hehehe. Dantadd 18:53, 18 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:TAM Linhas Aéreas Flight 3054 3.jpg. Parabéns pelas fotos, uma delas estampa a página principal da Wikipédia Anglófona. João Felipe C.S 19:08, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Imagem da sonda Darwin[edit]

Poderia por gentileza carregar essa imagem?--Lukas Brandão 12:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Agradecimentos[edit]

Olá, OS2Warp
Agradeço as suas boas-vindas e a resposta à pergunta na esplanada! Abs»» Nuno Arala 11:12, 29 December 2007 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 21:07, 23 February 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:19, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 19:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Desbloqueio.[edit]

Gostaria que me desbloqueasse na Wikipédia, eu sou Camara Municipal, e gostaria que você me desblooquasse porque o meu tempo de bloqueio já acabou e por favor, desbloque-me. --Daniel Oliveira 12:04, 2 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:07, 15 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

asturianu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  euskara  français  galego  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  українська  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文  中文(中国大陆)‎  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:WikiSampa 4.5 - 3.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by User:Sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 01:22, 28 April 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by sz-iwbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Sz-iwbot) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Sz-iwbot 03:03, 12 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

Legoktm (Talk) 03:03, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

deprecated function in your monobook.js[edit]

Dear user, I noticed that you use the includePage function in your monobook.js page.

This function is now obsolete, as the importScript function was introduced with rev:35064 to the MediaWiki Javascript core library wikibits.js. It also keeps track of already imported files.

To allow us to remove includePage from Mediawiki:Common.js I'd kindly ask you to replace its use with importScript (same syntax!). Thanks! --Dschwen 17:03, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Olá[edit]

Olá meu amigo, recebi uma mensagem em inglês aqui no Commons sobre a foto do Carlos Lima, mas nãoe sotu entendendo nada. Você poderia me ajudar? Está no endereço http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Junius Abraços, Junius (talk) 13:52, 11 August 2008 (UTC) Espera, acho que é uma mensagem sobre aquela que será deletada, ou seja, a duplicata. É isso mesmo. Respondi para o cara para deletar. Aqui você não é administrador também não, né? Abraços, Junius (talk) 15:07, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Imagens[edit]

Uma outra coisa gostaria de saber. Existe limite para imagens no Commons e para a galeria? Ou podemos subir e guardar na nossa galeria quantas queiramos? Amanhã tirarei fotos do Maracanã (bairro), Vila Isabel e da Boulevard 28 de Setembro. Abraços, Junius (talk) 03:31, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Bot[edit]

OS2Warp, a propósito, o que é um bot? Seria um robô? Como se cria um? Qualquer um pode ter um bot ou só quem é administrador? Você é um bot ou é pessoa de carne e osso como eu? Digo isso porque OS2Warp parece até nome de algum projeto andróide, ehehe. Abraços, Junius (talk) 13:17, 12 August 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Obrigado[edit]

Obrigado pela sua nota de boas-vindas na minha página de discussão. Um PS. é que eu fiz uma pergunta na Esplanada agora a pouco... —Gustavob (talk)–Gustavob(discussão)–01:25, 11 October 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Colocar permissao em uma imagem[edit]

Como coloca uma permissao de uma imagem? ou Qual permissao eu coloco em uma imagem? Eu nao entendi sobre colocar uma permissao em uma imagem. Eduardo Pazos (talk) 21:08, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Dúvida com upload de fotos com copyright[edit]

Oi OS2Warp, tudo bem? Olha só, estou com uma duvida no upload de fotos, acho talvez que você possa me ajudar. Bom estou participando de um projeto la na Wikipedia Lusofona, para expandir artigos de automobilismo e com isso estou passando pelo processo de inserção de fotos. Eu estou tentando arrumar fotos para todos carros. Há algumas que infelizmente não existem disponíveis no Commons. Porém existem varias fotos entre elas no Google, a maioria com Copyrights. Eis a questão de upload, sei que, pelo EUA, e contra upload de fotos sem copyright. Como eu procederia para fazer o upload dessas fotos, pois pretendo obter um atestado que comprove que o autor das fotos disponibiliza as fotos para uso meramente ilustrativo(tipo um OTRS), sem edições finais. O que você acha? Como procederia? Sou desinformado nessa área, mas tenho grande interesse em complementar esses artigos e melhorar a qualidade de uma forma geral da Wikipedia. Obrigado Vinicius Lima (talk) 14:51, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Spitzer- Telescopio.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 23:30, 17 June 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Ziraldo na Bienal do Livro de São Paulo.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

179.155.136.29 18:42, 1 October 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]