User talk:RetroRave

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, RetroRave!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | asturianu | azərbaycanca | Bahasa Banjar | català | čeština | Cymraeg | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | Esperanto | euskara | estremeñu | français | Frysk | galego | hrvatski | Bahasa Indonesia | interlingua | Interlingue | íslenska | italiano | Kiswahili | Kurdî | Latina | lietuvių | magyar | Bahasa Melayu | Mirandés | Nederlands | norsk | occitan | Plattdüütsch | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | rumantsch | Scots | shqip | sicilianu | slovenčina | slovenščina | Basa Sunda | suomi | svenska | Tagalog | Türkçe | vèneto | Tiếng Việt | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | български | Ирон | македонски | нохчийн | русский | српски / srpski | тоҷикӣ | українська | ქართული | Հայերեն | नेपाली | भोजपुरी | मराठी | हिन्दी | অসমীয়া | বাংলা | தமிழ் | മലയാളം | සිංහල | ไทย | ၽႃႇသႃႇတႆး  | မြန်မာဘာသာ | 한국어 | 日本語 | 中文 | 中文（台灣）‎ | 中文（简体）‎ | 中文（繁體）‎ | 粵語 | עברית | اردو | العربية | تۆرکجه | سنڌي | فارسی | +/−
Gnome-colors-alacarte.svg First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Help-browser.svg Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Gnome-applications-utilities.svg Goodies, tips, and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
  • You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
  • To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
  • You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
  • There are several tools to upload files.
  • Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.
Gnome-edit-delete.svg Made a mistake?
  • Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
  • Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 15:25, 27 November 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Licensing[edit]

You can nominate files for deletion, but you’re not allowed to remove license templates from file description pages. Please never do this again. Sealle (talk) 04:38, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Musa Cəlil (1959).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Musa Cəlil (1959).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

rubin16 (talk) 08:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pauls Tiltiņš (Paul Armand).jpg was recently deleted[edit]

File:Pauls Tiltiņš (Paul Armand).jpg was recently deleted by JuTa for reasons below. If you disagree with the deletion, you need to file an undeletion request.

Reason for deletion: No license since 1 December 2020

It's best to discuss with the administrator who deleted your file before filing an undeletion request. Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 06:14, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, VLu (talk) 09:01, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please remain calm and collegial[edit]

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ עברית ∙ +/−

Dialog-warning.svg
It is important to keep a cool head, especially when responding to comments against you or your edits. Personal attacks and disruptive comments only escalate a situation; please keep calm and remember that action can be taken against other parties if necessary. Please try to remain civil with your comments. Thanks!

--VLu (talk) 10:36, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Чем хамить, стоило бы расширить кругозор: COM:DW, COM:FOP Russia. --VLu (talk) 10:39, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]
VLu. Хамство здесь видите только Вы. Это к Вам вопросы за непонятные нападки. --RetroRave (talk) 12:37, 14 December 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Pyotr Masokha (1941).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg
File:Pyotr Masokha (1941).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Kharkivian (talk) 20:34, 18 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Journal Ukraine[edit]

Hi! Can you tell me why do you replace PD-Russia on PD-Ukraine here: [1]? Is this magazine was printed in UkrSSR at that moment? As I know the magazine's publishing house was located in Saratov. Just before renaming in "Soviet Ukraine" Kursant504 (talk) 09:14, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Kursant504, if this journal was created on the territory of the RSFSR, then it is advisable to indicate this, since there is no information about this in Wikipedia. The article about the magazine states that it is published in Kyiv, and not elsewhere. That's why I removed the template. If you confirm your words about the place of publication on the file page, then return the template. Farewell.--RetroRave (talk) 12:06, 28 April 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

License change[edit]

Hi, Why did you change this license. How is this an imrpovement? Broichmore (talk) 18:53, 17 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]

  • Hi, Broichmore, the date 1923 hasn't been used in the templates for a few years now (it's now expired) [You don't know about this], and there's no copyright protection for over 100 years after the author's death in any country, so that's an improvement. Thank you for your attention and mind your own business.--RetroRave (talk) 00:20, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    What do you mean, by mind my own business? This is my businesses. Broichmore (talk) 00:37, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    • Broichmore, I mean, are these edits something bad? No.Thank you for your work (and business)--RetroRave (talk) 00:47, 18 May 2023 (UTC), I'm just tired of some inaccuracies. And it is extremely doubtful that they will change the term of copyright protection in a big way. So this edit may not raise any special questions. Sorry my English and Good luck.--RetroRave (talk) 00:47, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
      My coding was correct. Outwardly 1923 shows as 1928. This was a 2D image, and you deleted that. Elsewhere you actually deleted a death date. Deleting those latter two points is a degrade. What is important here, is what is portrayed to the reader. Copyright law can change, I agree, however there is nothing wrong with the coding. Taking out the 2D and death variables, means we will have to revisit if copyright laws are tightened. There is more than enough outstanding work on the project still to do, without wasting resource on cleaning cleans. Broichmore (talk) 01:07, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    Broichmore, This is not true, I did not remove the 2D option (PD-Art remained in place). The date 1923 is no longer used in the template, it is desirable that it be discontinued, as it is no longer appropriate under modern law. And the dates of life are indicated in the object card. Okay, I'll put the date of the author's death. I hope we've finished talking. --RetroRave (talk) 01:16, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
    What you say about art not changing is true. All I saw was the scoring out in the top red edit. Compare red to green. It was very late at night.
    Compare the edit here, there is no change in the license. Only an edit of 1923.
    In itself the edit is not bad, just unnecessary. Nevertheless where is the policy your using to justify this strategy? Where is the consensus? Your saying that wikidata's infobox is taking over the death date function. I'm aware of Wikidata's benefits in part, however it reduces the accessibility of the project to the everyman. That's why I advocated retaining the deathdate. Licensing is already complicated enough.
    You mentioned modern law, well, it shifts sometimes often. For me that's justification for keeping the death date. Its the key element in the code. Unless wikidata takes over licensing completely, which (for art ) I'm in favour of.
    Like you I'm just tired of unnecessary edits. I take the trouble to minimize them, and that's hard work. There are more than enough images missing USA license, that can be concentrated on, never mind this. Every art example here at Help:Copyrights shows 1923 in the coding, and one of the two shows the death date.
    What is this? Are you joking. (PD-Art, not PD-art, sir). What is the justification for this change?
    While I'm at it I don't like being followed, or parroted at. Good luck to you. Broichmore (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2023 (UTC)Reply[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:RetroRave&oldid=765016464"