User talk:Sardaka

I usually contribute to the {{{English}}}-version of {{{Wikipedia}}} as user {{{Sardaka}}}. Please leave me deletion notifications on my talk page.

I have no idea how to reach Sardaka but I’m intrigued to the ruins, norther ridge Marramarra. It’s like my backyard down there :)

Contact- scubanath@hotmail.com Usage:

{{Notify me
|language=project language
|project=project name
|username=username of project
}}

English: Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sardaka!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki—it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (direct access). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, which produces: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|correct name}}` For more information read the full deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

--Herby ^{talk thyme} 11:35, 29 July 2008 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Varney-Parkes.pngEdit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Varney-Parkes.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 08:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Varney-Parkes-1.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Varney-Parkes-1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

—LX (talk, contribs) 08:17, 4 October 2014 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit and this edit to Woollahra, New South Wales. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Allforrous ^(Contact) --Allforrous 13:26, 17 April 2015 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Spot the Ritz 2009.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 6 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello!

Thank you for uploading File:Spot the Ritz 2009.jpg to the Wikimedia Commons. I noticed that when you uploaded from another Wikimedia project, you left out some important information, or copied it incorrectly. In the future, please consider using CommonsHelper, a tool which automates the process of moving files over. Thank you,

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

What did I leave out? @Magog the Ogre: Message text.Sardaka (talk) 06:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

In this case, the license was wrong, and one should probably have a link to the userpage of the uploader. Diff Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 12:35, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply[reply]

SardakaEdit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

	Sardaka
	Thanks for the photos, they've been great. And you're quite correct about Wikipedia's culture. The editor's are a bunch of authoritarian gate-keepers bent on excluding others. Sad. I didn't see Diary of a Man in Dispair, so I'll look farther. George.boeck (talk) 22:31, 7 April 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fairlight House-1.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

asturianu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fairlight House-1.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Leyo 13:35, 6 September 2017 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Fairlight House-3.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Fairlight House-3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:23, 5 January 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:(1) Sydney Opera House.JPGEdit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:(1) Sydney Opera House.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

B dash (talk) 04:04, 24 December 2018 (UTC)Reply[reply]

An unfree Flickr license has been found on File:Manifest Your Destiny (4054490433)a.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Manifest Your Destiny (4054490433)a.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (

), No derivative works (

), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedily deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as

(CC BY),

(CC BY-SA),

(CC0) and

(PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{Flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again.

Emha (talk) 13:25, 24 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Emha, the above file is just a crop of a larger image, which still remains in Category:Homeless people of Australia. Sardaka (talk) 07:41, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Hi Sardaka, your're right and I restored the file. If you upload a pic extracted from another here in Commons please use the {{Extracted image}}-template. According to the information you gave on the file page it was impossible for the flickr reviewer (and me) to see that you re-used a file with a valid licence here on Commons. Thanks, --Emha (talk) 08:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Deleted contentEdit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Sardaka, the following content you uploaded violates one or more of our policies and therefore has been or will soon be deleted:

File:PAVS 1017675023 d6cd6a7eb6 b.jpg

The Wikimedia Commons (this website) only hosts media files with a realistic educational purpose and that can be used for any purpose, including:

use in any work, regardless of content
creation of derivative works
commercial use
free distribution

See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons, and Commons:Image casebook for some specific examples. Some other Wikimedia projects have different licensing policies. For example, the English Wikipedia allows fair use of sounds and photographs. This is not the case on Wikimedia Commons; "fair use" materials are not acceptable here.

Please make sure that you only upload educational content you have created yourself, those which are out of copyright, or those for which you have the required permission for the work to be used in all the ways described above. Please note that derivative works of copyrighted material are also considered copyrighted. Again, please read through Commons:Licensing, which is quite crucial, to understanding how Wikimedia Commons works. Thanks for your contribution, and please do leave me a message if you have further questions.

Yours sincerely, — Racconish ^💬 12:43, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Naming conventionEdit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello Sardaka, could you please use more distinctive filenames? Names such as File:(1)Tawny Frogmouth-1.jpg and File:(1)Tawny frogmouth-1.jpg are really confusing. (Many of your files are listed here.)

My another question is, why do you use prefix (1) for your photos? It's also making mess in the category sorting as the brackets are sorted first. Regards — Draceane ^talk_contrib. 14:03, 6 September 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Another naming conventionEdit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Sardaka - also please note, for bird (and other animal, and plant) categories, Commons uses scientific names, not English names. Thanks! - MPF (talk) 10:55, 6 October 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Wall of Remembrance 003.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Wall of Remembrance 003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 09:06, 13 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Ibis Randwick Pond 003.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Ibis Randwick Pond 003.jpg

Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Ibis Randwick Pond 003.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

File:Ibis Randwick Pond 002.jpg

Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 15:15, 23 November 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Copyright status: File:Swallow in park 024.JPGEdit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Copyright status: File:Swallow in park 024.JPG

Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Swallow in park 024.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Yuval Y § Chat § 10:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:(1)Glebe Lane-2.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deutsch | English | +/−

Hello Sardaka, it appears that the version of File:(1)Glebe Lane-2.jpg which you uploaded 2018-05-16T10:03:35Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 30 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 15:59, 26 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Image corruption detected in File:(1)The Spot Festival 033.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Deutsch | English | +/−

Hello Sardaka, it appears that the version of File:(1)The Spot Festival 033.jpg which you uploaded 2018-03-12T09:33:02Z is broken or corrupt. Please review the image and attempt to correct this issue by uploading a new version of the file. TheSandBot will re-review this image again in 30 days. If it is still corrupt at that time, then the file may be nominated for deletion. This is most likely to happen when a substantial portion of the image is corrupt. Thank you,

TheSandBot (talk) 14:38, 27 February 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

St Mary's Roman Catholic Cathedral PhotoEdit

Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi Sardaka

This is not Sydney. The GPS coordinates are correct and point to a map of Perth, Western Australia. I am not sure how the word Sydney got there. I did not upload the image directly to commons, I uploaded this and others through a special wiki media competition page for historical sites. It is possible that the process of uploading to the competition page and the files being placed in commons someone or something, indexed this against St Mary's in Sydney. This is an error, it should be St Mary's in Perth. By the way, the copyright status was assigned by Wikimedia, I myself (the owner of the work), am happy for this and the other 100 or so photos uploaded for this competition (dated 11, 12 and 13 September 2018 on my contributions page), to be placed in the Public Domain (for unrestricted use).

Sorry for any confusion.

Regards Travis

====================Edit

Hi. Am trying to clarify the situation regarding your photo, . The description says it's St Mary's in Sydney, but it doesn't look much like the one in Sydney at all. Can we clarify this? Sardaka (talk) 10:07, 2 June 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Travis Saron (talk • contribs) 05:06, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Reply[reply]

====================Edit

FigbirdsEdit

Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

Hi! In 2019 you uploaded some pictures of a figbird and put it in Sphecotheres viridis folder. Are you sure this is correct name of that bird? Sphecotheres viridis lives on Timor island only (Indonesia), not in Australia. Only Australasian figbird (Sphecotheres vieilloti) lives in Australia. Of course you could make your photos in zoo, but I suspect, it's just a mistake. Can you confirm it? Pikador (talk) 18:36, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

This is because these taxons were treated as one species once – Australasian Figbird (Sphecotheres vieilloti) was formerly considered a subspecies of S. viridis. They were split and now they are classified as separate species. So if you made your pictures in Australia in Sydney as you stated, it means this is Australasian Figbird (Sphecotheres vieilloti). Pikador (talk) 10:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]
OK, I just want to confirm, you made these pictures in Sydney in wild (not in zoo or bird park)? Pikador (talk) 09:06, 5 March 2021 (UTC) Yes, in the wild. Sardaka (talk) 07:59, 5 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

FilenamesEdit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Could you try to be a little more distinct with your filenames? It's ridiculous to have (for instance) file:(1)Noisy_Miner.jpg, file:(1)Noisy_miner.jpg, and file:(1)noisy_miner.jpg, which are three completely different images (although, to be fair, they are all Noisy Miners).

(As are File:(1)Noisy miner-2.jpg and File:(1)Noisy Miner-2.jpg, and File:(1)Noisy Miner 013.jpg and File:(1)Noisy miner 013.jpg, and File:(1)Noisy miner Kensington Park-1.jpg and File:(1)Noisy Miner Kensington Park-1.jpg, and... )

These are good images, it's just that better filenames will make them more accessible and usable. DS (talk) 18:57, 4 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Geo coords of File:(1)Nielsen Park002.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hey there, I'm SHB2000 from the English Wikivoyage, and I just wanted to ask you the coordinates for this photo so I can add it to voy:Sydney Harbour National Park. If you don't remember, do you know where about is it in the park? Any information will be greatly appreciated. Thanks! SHB2000 (talk) 07:50, 11 June 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Little Ravens or Australian Ravens?Edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi. I notice you have many great photos of ravens in Category:Corvus mellori. However, many of them are labeled as being in various parts of Sydney, meaning they're almost certainly Australian ravens (Corvus coronoides) and not Little Ravens (Corvus mellori).

I'm not an expert in corvid taxonomy but here's a quote from ebird on Identifying Australian Raven and Little Raven in south-east Australia:

"In New South Wales, both Australian and Little Ravens are widespread across much of the state. Australian Ravens are the only corvid likely to be encountered in Sydney although Little Ravens can be found on the western outskirts." — https://ebird.org/australia/news/identifying-australian-raven-and-little-raven-in-south-east-australia (it's actually an interesting page and worth a read and listen)

This video from BirdLife Australia says similar: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2a1LpK44saU

Would you be able to re-classify your photos? Have a good one. Cheers, Pengo (talk) 13:44, 24 November 2021 (UTC)Reply[reply]

(1)Train crossing Sydney Harbour Bridge.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 7 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The filename suggests that the focus is the bridge, but the description says:

girl on train, Sydney

This suggests that the focus is the girl. What were you trying to capture in this photo? Also, did the girl consent? Brianjd (talk) 14:39, 19 October 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:St Peter Julians Church Sydney 016.jpgEdit

Latest comment: 6 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:St Peter Julians Church Sydney 016.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:44, 11 November 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

File:Aforest.JPGEdit

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

File:Aforest.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Chris.sherlock2 (talk) 13:59, 18 December 2022 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Add topic